Singh v. The City of New York
| Balwinder Singh |
| The City of New York, P.O. Mandeep Cheema, Tax Id. No. 950196, Individually and in his Official Capacity and Police Officers John Doe #1-10, Individually and in their Official Capacity (the name John Doe being fictitious, as the true names are presently unknown), |
| 23-24 |
| January 5, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| CIVIL RIGHTS-Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Balwinder Singh Brief due date as 04/19/2023. Joint Appendix due date as 04/19/2023, FILED.[3469250] [23-24] [Entered: 02/14/2023 04:54 PM] |
| Filing 24 NEW CASE MANAGER, Dana Ellwood, ASSIGNED.[3468956] [23-24] [Entered: 02/14/2023 01:13 PM] |
| Filing 18 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Balwinder Singh, informing Court of proposed due date 04/19/2023, RECEIVED. Service date 01/18/2023 by CM/ECF.[3454232] [23-24] [Entered: 01/18/2023 12:22 PM] |
| Filing 17 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Balwinder Singh, FILED. Service date 01/18/2023 by CM/ECF.[3454214] [23-24] [Entered: 01/18/2023 12:10 PM] |
| Filing 16 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Balwinder Singh, FILED. Service date 01/18/2023 by CM/ECF.[3454210] [23-24] [Entered: 01/18/2023 12:09 PM] |
| Filing 15 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Balwinder Singh, FILED. Service date 01/18/2023 by CM/ECF.[3454209] [23-24] [Entered: 01/18/2023 12:08 PM] |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY, Jamison Davies for The City of New York Police Officers John Doe #1-10 Mandeep Cheema, in case 23-24, [ # 13 ], ADDED.[3453837] [23-24] [Entered: 01/18/2023 09:02 AM] |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Mandeep Cheema, Police Officers John Doe #1-10 and The City of New York, FILED. Service date 01/17/2023 by CM/ECF. [3453625] [23-24] [Entered: 01/17/2023 04:23 PM] |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY, Richard Paul Dearing for The City of New York Police Officers John Doe #1-10 Mandeep Cheema, in case 23-24, [ # 10 ], ADDED.[3453606] [23-24] [Entered: 01/17/2023 04:17 PM] |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY, Amy McCamphill, [ # 9 ], in place of attorney Sylvia Hinds-Radix, SUBSTITUTED.[3453602] [23-24] [Entered: 01/17/2023 04:16 PM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Mandeep Cheema, Police Officers John Doe #1-10 and The City of New York, FILED. Service date 01/17/2023 by CM/ECF. [3453545] [23-24] [Entered: 01/17/2023 03:50 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee The City of New York, Police Officers John Doe #1-10 and Mandeep Cheema, FILED. Service date 01/17/2023 by CM/ECF. [3453420] [23-24] [Entered: 01/17/2023 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3449187] [23-24] [Entered: 01/09/2023 04:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Balwinder Singh, district court receipt # ANYEDC-16276729, FILED.[3449185] [23-24] [Entered: 01/09/2023 04:43 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 12/06/2022, RECEIVED.[3449183] [23-24] [Entered: 01/09/2023 04:42 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 09/30/2022, RECEIVED.[3449181] [23-24] [Entered: 01/09/2023 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Balwinder Singh, FILED. [3449176] [23-24] [Entered: 01/09/2023 04:37 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Singh v. The City of New York | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Balwinder Singh | |
| Represented By: | Joshua P. Fitch Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: The City of New York | |
| Represented By: | Sylvia Hinds-Radix Esq. |
| Represented By: | Jamison Davies |
| Represented By: | Richard Paul Dearing Esq. |
| Represented By: | Amy McCamphill |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: P.O. Mandeep Cheema, Tax Id. No. 950196, Individually and in his Official Capacity | |
| Represented By: | Sylvia Hinds-Radix Esq. |
| Represented By: | Jamison Davies |
| Represented By: | Richard Paul Dearing Esq. |
| Represented By: | Amy McCamphill |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Police Officers John Doe #1-10, Individually and in their Official Capacity (the name John Doe being fictitious, as the true names are presently unknown), | |
| Represented By: | Sylvia Hinds-Radix Esq. |
| Represented By: | Jamison Davies |
| Represented By: | Richard Paul Dearing Esq. |
| Represented By: | Amy McCamphill |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
