Brefo-Sarpong v. Annucci
| Joseph Brefo-Sarpong |
| Anthony Annucci |
| 23-256 |
| February 28, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| PRISONER PET-Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, for certificate of appealability, on behalf of Appellant Joseph Brefo-Sarpong, FILED. Service date 04/24/2023 by US mail.[3506584] [23-256] [Entered: 04/27/2023 07:12 PM] |
| Filing 18 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Joseph Brefo-Sarpong, FILED. Service date 04/24/2023 by US mail.[3506583] [23-256] [Entered: 04/27/2023 07:11 PM] |
Filing 17
ORDER, dated 04/04/2023, stating this appeal may be subject to dismissal by 04/25/2023, unless Appellant Joseph Brefo-Sarpong, moves for certificate of appealability, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3494147] [23-256] [Entered: 04/04/2023 02:15 PM]
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER, dated 04/04/2023, stating this appeal may be subject to dismissal by 04/25/2023, unless Appellant Joseph Brefo-Sarpong, submits an Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3494138] [23-256] [Entered: 04/04/2023 02:10 PM]
|
| Filing 14 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Anthony Annucci, FILED. Service date 03/17/2023 by US mail.[3485724] [23-256] [Entered: 03/17/2023 05:22 PM] |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY, Robert C. McIver, [ # 12 ], in place of attorney Barbara D. Underwood, SUBSTITUTED.[3485714] [23-256] [Entered: 03/17/2023 05:12 PM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Anthony Annucci, FILED. Service date 03/17/2023 by US mail. [3485633] [23-256] [Entered: 03/17/2023 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE, to Appellee Anthony Annucci, for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[3485487] [23-256] [Entered: 03/17/2023 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 8 FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3480862] [23-256] [Entered: 03/09/2023 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 7 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3476783] [23-256] [Entered: 03/02/2023 09:32 AM] |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3476780] [23-256] [Entered: 03/02/2023 09:30 AM] |
| Filing 5 NOTE: See lead case, 23-240, containing complete set of docket entries.[3476778] [23-256] [Entered: 03/02/2023 09:30 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT DECISION AND ORDER, dated 12/20/2022, RECEIVED.[3476768] [23-256] [Entered: 03/02/2023 09:24 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Joseph Brefo-Sarpong in 23-256, FILED. [3476761] [23-256, 23-240] [Entered: 03/02/2023 09:20 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Brefo-Sarpong v. Annucci | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Joseph Brefo-Sarpong | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Brefo-Sarpong |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: Anthony Annucci | |
| Represented By: | Barbara D. Underwood |
| Represented By: | Robert Christopher McIver Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
