Mike v. Drug Enforcement Administration
| Joseph Mike |
| Drug Enforcement Administration |
| 23-26 |
| January 6, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| PRISONER PET-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER, dated 02/06/2023, appeal may be dismissed by 02/27/2023, unless Appellant Joseph Mike, submits Form D-P, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[3464182] [23-26] [Entered: 02/06/2023 09:36 AM]
|
| Filing 14 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED.[3464174] [23-26] [Entered: 02/06/2023 09:33 AM] |
| Filing 13 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Scheduling Notification, [10], on behalf of Appellant Joseph Mike, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[3464167] [23-26] [Entered: 02/06/2023 09:29 AM] |
| Filing 12 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, motion to proceed in forma pauperis, [9], on behalf of Appellant Joseph Mike, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[3464163] [23-26] [Entered: 02/06/2023 09:24 AM] |
| Filing 11 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, [8], on behalf of Appellant Joseph Mike, copy to pro-se appellant, FILED.[3464154] [23-26] [Entered: 02/06/2023 09:19 AM] |
| Filing 10 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Joseph Mike, informing Court of proposed due date [no proposed date], RECEIVED. Service date 01/19/2023 by US mail.[3462427] [23-26] [Entered: 02/01/2023 02:12 PM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Joseph Mike, FILED. Service date 01/19/2023 by US mail.[3462426] [23-26] [Entered: 02/01/2023 02:06 PM] |
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Appellant Joseph Mike, FILED. Service date 01/19/2023 by US mail.[3462405] [23-26] [Entered: 02/01/2023 01:45 PM] |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Claire S. Kedeshian, [ # 6 ], in place of attorney Varuni Nelson, SUBSTITUTED.[3454165] [23-26] [Entered: 01/18/2023 11:45 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Drug Enforcement Administration, FILED. Service date 01/17/2023 by US mail. [3453273] [23-26] [Entered: 01/17/2023 01:01 PM] |
| Filing 4 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3449318] [23-26] [Entered: 01/10/2023 08:00 AM] |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3451853] [23-26] [Entered: 01/12/2023 04:37 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 12/07/2022, RECEIVED.[3449316] [23-26] [Entered: 01/10/2023 07:49 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Joseph Mike, FILED. [3449314] [23-26] [Entered: 01/10/2023 07:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Mike v. Drug Enforcement Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Joseph Mike | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Mike |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Drug Enforcement Administration | |
| Represented By: | Varuni Nelson |
| Represented By: | Claire S. Kedeshian |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
