Daum v. Eckert
Terry Daum |
Stewart Eckert |
23-272 |
March 1, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
PRISONER PET-Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 CURED DEFECTIVE MOTION, for certificate of appealability [ # 16 ], [ # 20 ], on behalf of Appellant Terry Daum, FILED.[3491261] [23-272] [Entered: 03/29/2023 01:04 PM] |
Filing 20 MOTION, for certificate of appealability, on behalf of Appellant Terry Daum, FILED. Service date 03/20/2023 by US mail.[3491254] [23-272] [Entered: 03/29/2023 01:02 PM] |
Filing 19 MOTION, to expand Certificate of Appealability request, on behalf of Appellant Terry Daum, FILED. Service date 03/20/2023 by US mail.[3491252] [23-272] [Entered: 03/29/2023 12:57 PM] |
Filing 18 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D-P, [15], on behalf of Appellant Terry Daum, FILED.[3487974] [23-272] [Entered: 03/22/2023 03:42 PM] |
Filing 17 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgement and Notice of Appearance, [14], on behalf of Appellant Terry Daum, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3487966] [23-272] [Entered: 03/22/2023 03:38 PM] |
Filing 16 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, motion, for certificate of appealability, [13], on behalf of Appellant Terry Daum, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3487464] [23-272] [Entered: 03/22/2023 09:56 AM] |
Filing 15 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Terry Daum, FILED. No Service.[3487458] [23-272] [Entered: 03/22/2023 09:54 AM] |
Filing 14 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Terry Daum, FILED. No Service.[3487456] [23-272] [Entered: 03/22/2023 09:52 AM] |
Filing 13 MOTION, for certificate of appealability, on behalf of Appellant Terry Daum, FILED. No Service.[3487453] [23-272] [Entered: 03/22/2023 09:51 AM] |
Filing 12 FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3485810] [23-272] [Entered: 03/19/2023 04:06 PM] |
Filing 10 PAPERS, Letter addressed to new york legal assitance group, RECEIVED.[3482754] [23-272] [Entered: 03/13/2023 08:45 PM] |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Thomas B. Litsky, [ # 8 ], in place of attorney Barara D. Underwood and Alexander Fumelli, SUBSTITUTED.[3481136] [23-272] [Entered: 03/09/2023 03:52 PM] |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Stewart Eckert, FILED. Service date 03/08/2023 by US mail. [3480393] [23-272] [Entered: 03/08/2023 03:57 PM] |
Filing 7 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3477854] [23-272] [Entered: 03/03/2023 03:01 PM] |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3477840] [23-272] [Entered: 03/03/2023 02:55 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 02/02/2023, RECEIVED.[3477837] [23-272] [Entered: 03/03/2023 02:54 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Terry Daum, FILED. [3477829] [23-272] [Entered: 03/03/2023 02:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Daum v. Eckert | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: Terry Daum | |
Represented By: | Terry Daum |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: Stewart Eckert | |
Represented By: | Thomas B. Litsky |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.