Dean v. Gaul
| David A. Dean |
| Jeffrey Gaul |
| 23-283 |
| March 3, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| CONTRACT-Other Contract Action |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, motion, to proceed in forma pauperis, for substantially reduced fee, [17],[17], on behalf of Appellant Jeffrey Gaul, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3507557] [23-283] [Entered: 05/01/2023 08:45 AM] |
| Filing 17 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, for substantially reduced fee, on behalf of Appellant Jeffrey Gaul, FILED. Service date 04/26/2023 by US mail.[3507500] [23-283] [Entered: 04/30/2023 05:27 PM] |
| Filing 16 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Jeffrey Gaul, FILED. Service date 04/26/2023 by US mail.[3507499] [23-283] [Entered: 04/30/2023 05:24 PM] |
| Filing 15 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Jeffrey Gaul, FILED. Service date 04/26/2023 by US mail.[3507498] [23-283] [Entered: 04/30/2023 05:23 PM] |
| Filing 14 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee David A. Dean, FILED. Service date 03/28/2023 by US mail.[3496003] [23-283] [Entered: 04/07/2023 11:19 AM] |
Filing 13
ORDER, dated 04/06/2023, dismissing appeal by 04/27/2023, unless Appellant Jeffrey Gaul, submits form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3495724] [23-283] [Entered: 04/06/2023 07:33 PM]
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE, to Appellee David A. Dean , for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[3495723] [23-283] [Entered: 04/06/2023 07:28 PM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER, dated 04/06/2023, dismissing appeal by 04/27/2023, unless Appellant Jeffrey Gaul, submits an Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3495722] [23-283] [Entered: 04/06/2023 07:20 PM]
|
| Filing 10 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, entered in the district court as docket entry dated 03/06/2023, denying IFP, RECEIVED.[3482748] [23-283] [Entered: 03/13/2023 07:55 PM] |
| Filing 8 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3479012] [23-283] [Entered: 03/07/2023 09:42 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE, re: pending district court IFP motion, to district court, SENT.[3479006] [23-283] [Entered: 03/07/2023 09:39 AM] |
| Filing 9 FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3481331] [23-283] [Entered: 03/10/2023 07:52 AM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3478985] [23-283] [Entered: 03/07/2023 09:29 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT DECISION AND ORDER, dated 01/31/2023, RECEIVED.[3478984] [23-283] [Entered: 03/07/2023 09:28 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Jeffrey Gaul, FILED. [3478952] [23-283] [Entered: 03/07/2023 09:17 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Dean v. Gaul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: David A. Dean | |
| Represented By: | Stephen A. Pechenik Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: Jeffrey Gaul | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Gaul |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
