Davis v. New York State Workers Compensation Board
Plaintiff / Appellant: Felissa A. Davis
Defendant / Appellee: New York State Workers Compensation Board and Judge Scott, NYS Workers Compensation Judge
Case Number: 23-327
Filed: March 10, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: CIVIL RIGHTS-Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER, dated 04/27/2023, dismissing appeal by 05/18/2023, unless Appellant Felissa A. Davis, submits fee or moves for in forma pauperis status, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3506446] [23-327] [Entered: 04/27/2023 04:04 PM]
April 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER, dated 04/27/2023, dismissing appeal by 05/18/2023, unless Appellant Felissa A. Davis, submits form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3506436] [23-327] [Entered: 04/27/2023 04:00 PM]
April 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER, dated 04/27/2023, dismissing appeal by 05/18/2023, unless Appellant Felissa A. Davis, submits Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3506427] [23-327] [Entered: 04/27/2023 03:53 PM]
April 5, 2023 Filing 10 ATTORNEY, Barbara D. Underwood, for New York State Workers Compensation Board and Scott, TERMINATED.[3494417] [23-327] [Entered: 04/05/2023 08:43 AM]
March 31, 2023 Filing 9 LETTER, on behalf of Appellee New York State Workers Compensation Board and Scott, requesting the Attorney Generals Office be removed as counsel as they do not currently represent the state Appellee's and can not file an appellees brief, RECEIVED. Service date 03/31/2023 by US mail.[3493148] [23-327] [Entered: 03/31/2023 08:06 PM]
March 13, 2023 Filing 4 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3482338] [23-327] [Entered: 03/13/2023 11:48 AM]
March 10, 2023 Filing 8 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3484301] [23-327] [Entered: 03/16/2023 07:48 AM]
March 10, 2023 Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 02/09/2023, RECEIVED.[3482336] [23-327] [Entered: 03/13/2023 11:47 AM]
March 10, 2023 Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT DECISION AND ORDER, dated 02/08/2023, RECEIVED.[3482335] [23-327] [Entered: 03/13/2023 11:46 AM]
March 10, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Felissa A. Davis, FILED. [3482317] [23-327] [Entered: 03/13/2023 11:31 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Davis v. New York State Workers Compensation Board
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Felissa A. Davis
Represented By: Felissa A. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: New York State Workers Compensation Board
Represented By: Barbara D. Underwood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Judge Scott, NYS Workers Compensation Judge
Represented By: Barbara D. Underwood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?