Stanbro v. Palou
Correction Officer John Doe #1, Correction Officer John Doe # 2, Correction Nurse John Doe, Correction Supervisor John Doe, Correction Officer Kristofer Leonardo, Correction Officer Richard Landry, Correction Nurse Gary Pagliaro, Correction Sergeant Enrique Torres and Frank Weber, DDS |
Chad Stanbro |
Correction Officer Nadya Palou and Correction Officer Raymond Deal |
23-347 |
March 14, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
PRISONER PET-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Raymond Deal and Nadya Palou Brief due date as 07/07/2023. Joint Appendix due date as 07/07/2023, FILED.[3505511] [23-347] [Entered: 04/26/2023 12:45 PM] |
Filing 44 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Raymond Deal and Nadya Palou in 23-347, informing Court of proposed due date 07/07/2023, RECEIVED. Service date 04/26/2023 by CM/ECF.[3505401] [23-347, 23-419] [Entered: 04/26/2023 11:02 AM] |
Filing 43 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Kristofer Leonardo in 23-419, 23-347 Brief due date as 07/06/2023. Joint Appendix due date as 07/06/2023, FILED.[3504976] [23-419, 23-347] [Entered: 04/25/2023 04:14 PM] |
Filing 42 NEW CASE MANAGER, Jessica Mckenzie, ASSIGNED.[3504972] [23-419] [Entered: 04/25/2023 04:12 PM] |
Filing 41 NEW CASE MANAGER, Jessica Mckenzie, ASSIGNED.[3504970] [23-347] [Entered: 04/25/2023 04:09 PM] |
Filing 35 NOTICE, to Appellee Chad Stanbro, for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[3496823] [23-419] [Entered: 04/10/2023 02:43 PM] |
Filing 34 CURED DEFECTIVE FORM C, [ # 33 ], on behalf of Appellants Raymond Deal and Nadya Palou, FILED.[3496822] [23-347] [Entered: 04/10/2023 02:42 PM] |
Filing 33 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Raymond Deal and Nadya Palou, FILED. Service date 04/10/2023 by CM/ECF.[3496814] [23-347] [Entered: 04/10/2023 02:34 PM] |
Filing 32 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form C, [30], on behalf of Appellants Raymond Deal and Nadya Palou, FILED.[3496678] [23-347] [Entered: 04/10/2023 12:08 PM] |
Filing 31 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Raymond Deal and Nadya Palou, FILED. Service date 04/10/2023 by CM/ECF.[3496666] [23-347] [Entered: 04/10/2023 12:00 PM] |
Filing 30 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Raymond Deal and Nadya Palou, FILED. Service date 04/10/2023 by CM/ECF.[3496665] [23-347] [Entered: 04/10/2023 11:59 AM] |
Filing 25 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Kristofer Leonardo in 23-347, 23-419, informing Court of proposed due date 07/06/2023, RECEIVED. Service date 04/06/2023 by CM/ECF.[3495353] [23-347, 23-419] [Entered: 04/06/2023 12:16 PM] |
Filing 24 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Chad Stanbro, FILED. Service date 03/31/2023 by CM/ECF.[3492876] [23-347] [Entered: 03/31/2023 02:25 PM] |
Filing 23 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Kristofer Leonardo, FILED. Service date 03/31/2023 by CM/ECF.[3492670] [23-347] [Entered: 03/31/2023 11:57 AM] |
Filing 22 ORDER, dated 03/31/2023, dismissing appeal by 04/14/2023, unless Appellants Raymond Deal and Nadya Palou, submits Form C, FILED.[3492659] [23-347] [Entered: 03/31/2023 11:55 AM] |
Filing 21 ORDER, dated 03/31/2023, dismissing appeal by 04/14/2023, unless Appellants Raymond Deal and Nadya Palou, submit an Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, FILED.[3492623] [23-347] [Entered: 03/31/2023 11:26 AM] |
Filing 20 NOTICE, to Appellee Chad Stanbro, for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[3492615] [23-347] [Entered: 03/31/2023 11:22 AM] |
Filing 19 ATTORNEY, Blair Greenwald, [ # 18 ], in place of attorney Barbara D. Underwood, SUBSTITUTED.[3491309] [23-347, 23-419] [Entered: 03/29/2023 01:55 PM] |
Filing 18 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellant Kristofer Leonardo in 23-347, 23-419, FILED. Service date 03/29/2023 by CM/ECF. [3491301] [23-347, 23-419] [Entered: 03/29/2023 01:48 PM] |
Filing 17 STRIKE ORDER, striking Appellants Raymond Deal and Nadya Palou, Form C, [6], from the docket, FILED.[3490674] [23-347] [Entered: 03/28/2023 03:09 PM] |
Filing 13 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form C, [6], on behalf of Appellants Raymond Deal and Nadya Palou, FILED.[3489443] [23-347] [Entered: 03/24/2023 07:37 PM] |
Filing 12 CAPTION, Kristofer Leonardo's designation was changed to Defendant-Appellant, AMENDED.[3489441] [23-347] [Entered: 03/24/2023 07:33 PM] |
Filing 7 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Raymond Deal and Nadya Palou, FILED. Service date 03/24/2023 by CM/ECF.[3489395] [23-347] [Entered: 03/24/2023 04:57 PM] |
Filing 6 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Raymond Deal and Nadya Palou, FILED. Service date 03/24/2023 by CM/ECF.[3489394] [23-347] [Entered: 03/24/2023 04:57 PM] |
Filing 10 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3489439] [23-419] [Entered: 03/24/2023 07:20 PM] |
Filing 9 NOTE: See lead case, 23-347, containing complete set of docket entries.[3489438] [23-419] [Entered: 03/24/2023 07:19 PM] |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Kristofer Leonardo in 23-419, FILED. [3489435] [23-419, 23-347] [Entered: 03/24/2023 07:13 PM] |
Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellants Raymond Deal and Nadya Palou, district court receipt # ANYSDC-27465051, FILED.[3484218] [23-347] [Entered: 03/15/2023 04:41 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 02/21/2023, RECEIVED.[3484216] [23-347] [Entered: 03/15/2023 04:40 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellants Raymond Deal and Nadya Palou, FILED. [3484211] [23-347] [Entered: 03/15/2023 04:38 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.