Bleyle v. Chenango County
Plaintiff / Appellant: Robert J. Bleyle
Defendant / Appellee: Chenango County and The City of Norwich, New York
Case Number: 23-406
Filed: March 21, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: CIVIL RIGHTS-Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 11, 2023 Filing 17 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D, [14], on behalf of Appellant Robert J. Bleyle, FILED.[3513940] [23-406] [Entered: 05/11/2023 11:02 AM]
May 11, 2023 Filing 16 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form C, [13], on behalf of Appellant Robert J. Bleyle, FILED.[3513930] [23-406] [Entered: 05/11/2023 10:57 AM]
May 11, 2023 Filing 15 NOTICE, to Appellee Chenango County and The City of Norwich, New York , for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[3513923] [23-406] [Entered: 05/11/2023 10:54 AM]
May 3, 2023 Filing 14 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Robert J. Bleyle, FILED. Service date 05/03/2023 by CM/ECF.[3509530] [23-406] [Entered: 05/03/2023 01:27 PM]
May 3, 2023 Filing 13 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Robert J. Bleyle, FILED. Service date 05/03/2023 by CM/ECF.[3509526] [23-406] [Entered: 05/03/2023 01:24 PM]
May 2, 2023 Filing 12 MOTION ORDER, granting motion for admission pro hac vice. Counsel is directed to register as a Filing User under Local Rule 25.1 to file documents electronically in this case within three (3) days of the date of this order. [ # 8 ] filed by Appellant Robert J. Bleyle, by SALM, FILED. [3508563][12] [23-406] [Entered: 05/02/2023 11:50 AM]
April 25, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION, for admission pro hac vice, on behalf of Appellant Robert J. Bleyle, FILED. Service date 04/25/2023 by email.[3507430] [23-406] [Entered: 04/28/2023 06:56 PM]
March 24, 2023 Filing 7 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3489510] [23-406] [Entered: 03/27/2023 08:48 AM]
March 21, 2023 Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Robert J. Bleyle, district court receipt # ANYNDC-6237338, FILED.[3488744] [23-406] [Entered: 03/23/2023 05:53 PM]
March 21, 2023 Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 02/22/2023, RECEIVED.[3488742] [23-406] [Entered: 03/23/2023 05:52 PM]
March 21, 2023 Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 02/22/2023, RECEIVED.[3488741] [23-406] [Entered: 03/23/2023 05:51 PM]
March 21, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Robert J. Bleyle, FILED. [3488737] [23-406] [Entered: 03/23/2023 05:47 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Bleyle v. Chenango County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Robert J. Bleyle
Represented By: Douglas Walter Drazen Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Chenango County
Represented By: Frank W. Miller Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: The City of Norwich, New York
Represented By: Frank W. Miller Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?