Jean-Baptiste v. United States Department of Justice
Harold Jean-Baptiste |
United States Department of Justice, Merrick B. Garland, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Christopher Wray, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigations, in his official capacity, City of New York, Mayor Eric L. Adams, in his official capacity, Police Commissioner Keechant Sewell, in his official capacity, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York and Damian Williams, United States Attorney |
23-441 |
March 27, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
CIVIL RIGHTS-Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ATTORNEY, Lauren L. O'Brien, [ # 20 ], in place of attorney Sylvia Hinds-Radix, SUBSTITUTED.[3503895] [23-441] [Entered: 04/24/2023 11:26 AM] |
Filing 20 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Eric L. Adams, City of New York, Keechant Sewell and Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, FILED. Service date 04/21/2023 by CM/ECF, US mail. [3503029] [23-441] [Entered: 04/21/2023 11:23 AM] |
Filing 19 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion to add a party, [18], on behalf of Appellant Mr. Harold Jean-Baptiste, FILED.[3502111] [23-441] [Entered: 04/19/2023 07:42 PM] |
Filing 17 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Federal Bureau of Investigation, Merrick B. Garland, United States Department of Justice, Damian Williams and Christopher Wray, FILED. Service date 04/17/2023 by CM/ECF, US mail.[3500634] [23-441] [Entered: 04/17/2023 04:32 PM] |
Filing 16 LETTER, on behalf of Appellee Federal Bureau of Investigation, Merrick B. Garland, United States Department of Justice, Damian Williams and Christopher Wray, stating that they will not participate in the appeal, RECEIVED. Service date 04/17/2023 by CM/ECF, US mail.[3500632] [23-441] [Entered: 04/17/2023 04:31 PM] |
Filing 18 MOTION, to add party, on behalf of Appellant Mr. Harold Jean-Baptiste, FILED. Service date 04/14/2023 by US mail.[3502109] [23-441] [Entered: 04/19/2023 07:41 PM] |
Filing 15 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D-P and Acknowledgement, [13], [12], on behalf of Appellant Mr. Harold Jean-Baptiste, FILED.[3497595] [23-441] [Entered: 04/11/2023 03:36 PM] |
Filing 14 ATTORNEY, Barbara Underwood, for the Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York, TERMINATED.[3497572] [23-441] [Entered: 04/11/2023 03:20 PM] |
Filing 13 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Mr. Harold Jean-Baptiste, FILED. No service.[3497550] [23-441] [Entered: 04/11/2023 03:06 PM] |
Filing 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Mr. Harold Jean-Baptiste, FILED. No service.[3497548] [23-441] [Entered: 04/11/2023 03:04 PM] |
Filing 7 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Mr. Harold Jean-Baptiste, district court receipt # 14588, FILED.[3494615] [23-441] [Entered: 04/05/2023 11:14 AM] |
Filing 5 LETTER, on behalf of Appellee Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York, stating that they will not be participating in this appeal, RECEIVED. Service date 03/31/2023 by CM/ECF, US mail.[3493151] [23-441]--[Edited 04/03/2023 by DGB] [Entered: 03/31/2023 08:10 PM] |
Filing 4 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3491193] [23-441] [Entered: 03/29/2023 11:54 AM] |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3491186] [23-441] [Entered: 03/29/2023 11:50 AM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND ORDER, dated 03/27/2023, RECEIVED.[3491182] [23-441] [Entered: 03/29/2023 11:49 AM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Harold Jean-Baptiste, FILED. [3491176] [23-441] [Entered: 03/29/2023 11:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.