Davis v. Hudson
| Sabrina Brooks, Shabria Davis and Shatorra Davis |
| Brian O'Keefe, Law Clerk, Suffolk County District Attorney Office, D.A., Suffolk County 4th precinct Department, Police, The County of Suffolk, Suffolk County Police Department, Suffolk Detectives Alfred Ciccotto and Sgt. William Lamb |
| Stanley Davis |
| Hon. Jame C. Hudson |
| 23-55 |
| January 12, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| CIVIL RIGHTS-Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 CURED DEFECTIVE MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, [ # 18 ], [ # 19 ], on behalf of Appellant Stanley Davis, FILED.[3471176] [23-55] [Entered: 02/17/2023 12:30 PM] |
| Filing 19 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Stanley Davis, FILED. Service date 02/07/2023 by US mail.[3471174] [23-55] [Entered: 02/17/2023 12:29 PM] |
| Filing 18 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, to proceed in forma pauperis, [17], on behalf of Appellant Stanley Davis, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3466557] [23-55] [Entered: 02/09/2023 12:28 PM] |
| Filing 17 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Stanley Davis, FILED. No service.[3466551] [23-55] [Entered: 02/09/2023 12:26 PM] |
| Filing 16 CURED DEFECTIVE ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, and FORM D-P, [ # 8 ], [ # 9 ], [ # 14 ], [ # 15 ], on behalf of Appellant Stanley Davis, FILED.[3465278] [23-55] [Entered: 02/07/2023 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 15 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Stanley Davis, FILED. Service date 02/02/2023 by US mail.[3465273] [23-55] [Entered: 02/07/2023 04:05 PM] |
| Filing 14 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Stanley Davis, FILED. Service date 02/02/2023 by US mail.[3465271] [23-55] [Entered: 02/07/2023 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY, David Lawrence III, [ # 12 ], in place of attorney Barbara D. Underwood, SUBSTITUTED.[3462904] [23-55] [Entered: 02/02/2023 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Jame C. Hudson, FILED. Service date 02/02/2023 by US mail. [3462821] [23-55] [Entered: 02/02/2023 10:08 AM] |
Filing 11
ORDER, dated 02/01/2023, dismissing appeal by 02/22/2023, unless Appellant Stanley Davis, submits fee or moves for in forma pauperis, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3462354] [23-55] [Entered: 02/01/2023 12:58 PM]
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE, to Appellee Jame C. Hudson, for failure to file an appearance, copy to pro se appellant, SENT.[3462314] [23-55] [Entered: 02/01/2023 12:35 PM] |
| Filing 9 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, From D-P, [ # 7 ], on behalf of Appellant Stanley Davis, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3459228] [23-55] [Entered: 01/26/2023 11:30 AM] |
| Filing 8 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance, [ # 6 ], on behalf of Appellant Stanley Davis, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3459213] [23-55] [Entered: 01/26/2023 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 7 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Stanley Davis, FILED. Service date 01/23/2023 by US mail.[3459210] [23-55] [Entered: 01/26/2023 11:19 AM] |
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Stanley Davis, FILED. Service date 01/23/2023 by US mail.[3459209] [23-55] [Entered: 01/26/2023 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 4 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3452392] [23-55] [Entered: 01/13/2023 01:39 PM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3452387] [23-55] [Entered: 01/13/2023 01:37 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT TEXT ORDER, dated 12/14/2022, RECEIVED.[3452384] [23-55] [Entered: 01/13/2023 01:36 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Stanley Davis, FILED. [3452373] [23-55] [Entered: 01/13/2023 01:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
