Malek v. James
| Robert Malek, Individually and in C/O M.M. |
| Letitia James, Personal and Professional Capacity, Administration for Children Services, Commissioner Jess Dannhauser, Personal and Professional Capacity, New York State Unified Court System, Northern District, New York State Office of Children and Family Services, Northern District, New York State Office of The Inspector General, Northern District, City of New York, Andrew Hevesi, Personal and Professional Capacity, NYC Children, Sheila Poole, In Personal and Professional Capacity, Commissioner of the Office of Children and Family Services, Janet DiFiore, In Personal and Professional Capacity, CEO of the New York State Unified Court System, Conducts the Excellence Initiative, AKA Janet Difiore Glazer, Jacqueline Williams, Personal and Professional Capacity, Margaret Ingoglia, Travis Johnson, In Personal and Professional Capacity, Rosmil Almonte, In Personal and Professional Capacity, Excellence Initiative, Legal Aid Society, Iyesha Witherspoon, In Personal and Professional Capacity, Bolade Begho, Paula Garcia, Personal and Professional Capacity, Nicola Gibson, Personal and Professional Capacity, Corporate Counsel, Brooklyn D.A. Office, David Hansell, Personal and Professional Capacity, Janet Sabel, Personal and Professional Capacity, Leotta Green, Personal and Professional Capacity, Kathryn Conway, Personal and Professional Capacity, Stephen Louis, Personal and Professional Capacity, Ardaisha Hudson, Personal and Professional Capacity, New York State Attorney General's Office, Northern District, Amanda White, Personal and Professional Capacity, Amy Serlin, Personal and Professional Capacity, Joseph Palomino Ingoglia, Rashima Ferguson, Personal and Professional Capacity and Manhattan DA's Office |
| 23-550 |
| April 10, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| CIVIL RIGHTS-Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 UNDELIVERABLE MAIL, to USCA from USPS, RECEIVED.[3520943] [23-550] [Entered: 05/24/2023 05:26 PM] |
| Filing 16 ATTORNEY, Amanda Abata, [ # 15 ], in place of attorney Sylvia Hinds-Radix, SUBSTITUTED.[3520941] [23-550] [Entered: 05/24/2023 05:25 PM] |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee NYC Children, City of New York, Rosmil Almonte and Corporate Counsel, FILED. Service date 05/11/2023 by US mail. [3514090] [23-550] [Entered: 05/11/2023 12:47 PM] |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Administration for Children Services, Rosmil Almonte, City of New York, Corporate Counsel and NYC Children, FILED. Service date 05/08/2023 by US mail. [3512089] [23-550] [Entered: 05/08/2023 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 13 ATTORNEY, Barbara D. Underwood, for Administration for Children Services, Jess Dannhauser, Janet DiFiore, Excellence Initiative, Andrew Hevesi, Letitia James, New York State Attorney General's Office, New York State Office of Children and Family Services, New York State Office of The Inspector General, New York State Unified Court System, Sheila Poole and Jacqueline Williams, TERMINATED.[3511673] [23-550] [Entered: 05/08/2023 11:14 AM] |
| Filing 12 LETTER, on behalf of Appellee Administration for Children Services, Jess Dannhauser, Janet DiFiore, Excellence Initiative, Andrew Hevesi, Letitia James, New York State Attorney General's Office, New York State Office of Children and Family Services, New York State Office of The Inspector General, New York State Unified Court System, Sheila Poole and Jacqueline Williams, informing the Court that New York State Attorney Generals Office does not currently represent the state defendants and thus cannot appear as counsel or file an appellees brief., RECEIVED. Service date 05/02/2023 by CM/ECF, US mail.[3508830] [23-550] [Entered: 05/02/2023 02:43 PM] |
Filing 11
ORDER, dated 05/01/2023, dismissing appeal by 05/22/2023, unless Appellant Robert Malek, submits fee or moves for in forma pauperis, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3507866] [23-550] [Entered: 05/01/2023 12:08 PM]
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER, dated 05/01/2023, dismissing appeal by 05/22/2023, unless Appellant Robert Malek, submits Form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3507860] [23-550] [Entered: 05/01/2023 12:04 PM]
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER, dated 05/01/2023, dismissing appeal by 05/22/2023, unless Appellant Robert Malek, submits an Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3507856] [23-550] [Entered: 05/01/2023 11:58 AM]
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE, to Appellee Administration for Children Services, Rosmil Almonte, Brooklyn D.A. Office, City of New York, Corporate Counsel, Jess Dannhauser, Janet DiFiore, Excellence Initiative, Andrew Hevesi, Letitia James, Manhattan DA's Office, NYC Children, New York State Attorney General's Office, New York State Office of Children and Family Services, New York State Office of The Inspector General, New York State Unified Court System, Sheila Poole and Jacqueline Williams , for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[3507851] [23-550] [Entered: 05/01/2023 11:55 AM] |
| Filing 7 UNDELIVERABLE MAIL, from Robert Malek to USCA from USPS, return to sender, unable to forward, RECEIVED.[3507845] [23-550] [Entered: 05/01/2023 11:51 AM] |
| Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3500347] [23-550] [Entered: 04/17/2023 12:51 PM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3499124] [23-550] [Entered: 04/13/2023 06:52 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 03/10/2023, RECEIVED.[3499122] [23-550] [Entered: 04/13/2023 06:51 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Robert Malek, FILED. [3499116] [23-550] [Entered: 04/13/2023 06:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
