Rodriguez v. Lee
| Marcos Rodriguez |
| Warden William Lee, as superintendent Eastern Correctional Facility |
| 23-557 |
| April 11, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| PRISONER PET-Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 43 CURED DEFECTIVE MOTION, for certificate of appealability [ # 25 ], [ # 35 ], on behalf of Appellant Marcos Rodriguez, FILED.[3522494] [23-557] [Entered: 05/27/2023 02:29 PM] |
| Filing 39 MOTION ORDER, granting motion to file oversized Motion for Certificate of Appealability [ # 29 ] filed by Appellant Marcos Rodriguez, by MHP, FILED. [3520270][39] [23-557] [Entered: 05/23/2023 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 35 MOTION, for certificate of appealability, on behalf of Appellant Marcos Rodriguez, FILED. Service date 05/12/2023 by CM/ECF. [3514809] [23-557] [Entered: 05/12/2023 01:33 PM] |
| Filing 33 CURED DEFECTIVE Motion, to file oversized brief [ # 32 ], [ # 29 ], on behalf of Appellant Marcos Rodriguez, FILED.[3514719] [23-557] [Entered: 05/12/2023 11:35 AM] |
| Filing 32 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, MOTION, to file oversized brief, [26], on behalf of Appellant Marcos Rodriguez, FILED.[3514646] [23-557] [Entered: 05/12/2023 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 31 ATTORNEY, Barbara D. Underwood, for Appellee William Lee, TERMINATED.[3514618] [23-557] [Entered: 05/12/2023 10:04 AM] |
| Filing 29 MOTION, to file oversized brief, on behalf of Appellant Marcos Rodriguez, FILED. Service date 05/11/2023 by CM/ECF. [3513917] [23-557] [Entered: 05/11/2023 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 27 LETTER, on behalf of Appellee William Lee, requesting that the Court remove the Office of the Attorney General as counsel for the respondent-appellee, RECEIVED. Service date 05/09/2023 by CM/ECF.[3512882] [23-557]--[Edited 05/12/2023 by CGP] [Entered: 05/09/2023 04:31 PM] |
| Filing 26 MOTION, to file oversized brief, on behalf of Appellant Marcos Rodriguez, FILED. Service date 05/09/2023 by CM/ECF. [3512753] [23-557] [Entered: 05/09/2023 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 25 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, motion for certificate of appealability, [23], on behalf of Appellant Marcos Rodriguez, FILED.[3512508] [23-557] [Entered: 05/09/2023 11:02 AM] |
| Filing 23 MOTION, for certificate of appealability, on behalf of Appellant Marcos Rodriguez, FILED. Service date 05/04/2023 by CM/ECF. [3510246] [23-557] [Entered: 05/04/2023 01:16 PM] |
| Filing 22 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, motion, for certificate of appealability, [17], on behalf of Appellant Marcos Rodriguez, FILED.[3509925] [23-557] [Entered: 05/04/2023 09:26 AM] |
| Filing 21 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, for certificate of appealability, [18], on behalf of Appellant Marcos Rodriguez, FILED.[3509916] [23-557] [Entered: 05/04/2023 09:20 AM] |
| Filing 18 BRIEF, on behalf of Appellant Marcos Rodriguez, FILED. Service date 05/02/2023 by CM/ECF.[3508806] [23-557] [Entered: 05/02/2023 02:27 PM] |
| Filing 17 MOTION, for certificate of appealability, on behalf of Appellant Marcos Rodriguez, FILED. Service date 05/02/2023 by CM/ECF. [3508803] [23-557] [Entered: 05/02/2023 02:26 PM] |
| Filing 16 CURED DEFECTIVE NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL [ # 12 ], [ # 13 ], on behalf of Appellant Marcos Rodriguez, FILED.[3508709] [23-557] [Entered: 05/02/2023 01:25 PM] |
| Filing 15 ATTORNEY, Jaime T. Halscott, [ # 13 ], in place of attorney Paul Pricey Martin, SUBSTITUTED.[3508708] [23-557] [Entered: 05/02/2023 01:24 PM] |
| Filing 14 LETTER, dated 05/02/2023, on behalf of Appellant Marcos Rodriguez, indicating that Jamie Halscott is the new attorney for the Appellant , RECEIVED. Service date 05/02/2023 by email.[3508703] [23-557] [Entered: 05/02/2023 01:22 PM] |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellant Marcos Rodriguez, FILED. Service date 05/01/2023 by CM/ECF. [3507799] [23-557] [Entered: 05/01/2023 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 12 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Notice of Appearance as Substitute Counsel, [11], on behalf of Appellant Marcos Rodriguez, FILED.[3506693] [23-557] [Entered: 04/28/2023 09:05 AM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellant Marcos Rodriguez, FILED. Service date 04/27/2023 by CM/ECF. [3506387] [23-557] [Entered: 04/27/2023 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee William Lee, FILED. Service date 04/25/2023 by CM/ECF.[3504601] [23-557] [Entered: 04/25/2023 11:51 AM] |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY, David M. Cohn, [ # 8 ], in place of attorney Nancy Darragh Killian, SUBSTITUTED.[3502460] [23-557] [Entered: 04/20/2023 12:20 PM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee William Lee, FILED. Service date 04/17/2023 by CM/ECF. [3500532] [23-557] [Entered: 04/17/2023 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 7 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Attorney Paul Pricey Martin, Esq. for Appellant Marcos Rodriguez, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED.[3499332] [23-557] [Entered: 04/14/2023 09:57 AM] |
| Filing 5 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Marcos Rodriguez, district court receipt # ANYSDC-27585044, FILED.[3499324] [23-557] [Entered: 04/14/2023 09:51 AM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3499320] [23-557] [Entered: 04/14/2023 09:48 AM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 03/13/2023, RECEIVED.[3499319] [23-557] [Entered: 04/14/2023 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION and ORDER, dated 03/13/2023, RECEIVED.[3499318] [23-557] [Entered: 04/14/2023 09:46 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Marcos Rodriguez, FILED. [3499314] [23-557] [Entered: 04/14/2023 09:43 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
