Green v. United States of America
| DONALD GREEN |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 23-6360 |
| April 18, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER, dated 06/30/2023, staying the decision on the motion for leave to file a successive 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion until further order of this Court to allow adequate times for review of the motion, receipt of relevant records, and issuance of a decision, by DC, copy to pro se petitioner, FILED. [Entered: 06/30/2023 03:07 PM] [Edited: 06/30/2023 03:13 PM]
|
| Filing 11 MOTION, to file successive application, on behalf of Petitioner Donald Green, FILED. Service date 06/05/2023 by United States Mail. [Entered: 06/27/2023 05:46 PM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER, dated 06/15/2023, stating the underlying petition will be denied effective 07/06/2023, unless the Petitioner Donald Green, properly files a second or successive habeas corpus petition. Any motions pending prior to the date of denial will be deemed moot, copy to pro se petitioner, FILED. [Entered: 06/15/2023 01:11 PM] [Edited: 06/15/2023 01:13 PM]
|
| Filing 9 STRIKE ORDER, striking Petitioner Donald Green Second or Successive Application FILED at entry number 1 from the docket, copy to pro se petitioner, FILED. [Entered: 05/23/2023 03:31 PM] |
| Filing 8 CURED DEFECTIVE Acknowledgment Notice of Appearance Form, at entry 6, 7, on behalf of filer Respondent United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 05/01/2023 06:48 PM] |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Respondent United States of America, FILED. Service date 05/01/2023 by United States Mail. [Entered: 05/01/2023 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 6 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment Notice of Appearance Form, at docket entry 5, on behalf of Respondent United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 05/01/2023 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Respondent United States of America, FILED. Service date 04/26/2023 by United States Mail. [Entered: 04/26/2023 03:54 PM] |
| Filing 4 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 04/18/2023 11:31 AM] |
| Filing 3 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Second or Successive Application FILED, at docket entry 1, on behalf of Petitioner Donald Green, FILED. [Entered: 04/18/2023 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION, for Second or Successive habeas petition, on behalf of Petitioner Donald Green, OPENED. [Entered: 04/18/2023 11:01 AM] |
| Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING, MOTION for an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive application, on behalf of Petitioner Donald Green, FILED. [Entered: 04/18/2023 10:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Green v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: DONALD GREEN | |
| Represented By: | Donald Green |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Tiffany H. Lee |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
