United States of America v. Rankin
| JAMES SULLIVAN, JOHN BILDA, EDWARD DEMUZZIO and EDWARD PRYOR |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| DREW RANKIN |
| 23-6609 |
| June 12, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 ATTORNEY, Sarah P Karwan for Appellee United States of America, TERMINATED. [23-6559, 23-6608, 23-6609] [Entered: 11/07/2023 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 21 LETTER, dated 11/07/2023, requesting to terminate counsel, on behalf of AppelleeUSA United States of America, RECEIVED. Service date 11/07/2023 by ACMS. [Entered: 11/07/2023 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 20 MOTION ORDER, granting motion to extend time to file opening brief on 12/26/2023, at docket entry 19, on behalf of , by JAC, FILED. [23-6559, 23-6608, 23-6609] [Entered: 10/10/2023 03:44 PM] |
| Filing 19 MOTION, for extension of time, on behalf of Appellant James Sullivan, FILED. Service date 09/29/2023 by ACMS. [23-6559, 23-6608, 23-6609] [Entered: 09/29/2023 01:59 PM] |
| Filing 18 MOTION ORDER, granting motion for extension of time to file opening brief on 11/03/2023, at docket entry 17, on behalf of Appellants, by JAC, FILED. [23-6559, 23-6608, 23-6609] [Entered: 08/15/2023 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 17 MOTION, for extension of time, on behalf of Appellant James Sullivan, FILED. Service date 08/11/2023 by ACMS. [23-6559, 23-6608, 23-6609] [Entered: 08/11/2023 04:53 PM] |
| Filing 16 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Drew Rankin Brief due date as 09/20/2023. Joint Appendix due date as 09/20/2023, FILED. [23-6609, 23-6559] [Entered: 06/22/2023 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 15 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Drew Rankin, informing Court of proposed due date 09/20/2023, RECEIVED. Service date 06/22/2023 by ACMS. [Entered: 06/22/2023 10:36 AM] |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY, Sarah P Karwan for Appellee United States of America, ADDED. [Entered: 06/21/2023 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 06/21/2023 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 12 NEW CASE MANAGER, Oscar Rivas, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 06/21/2023 09:15 AM] |
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 06/15/2023 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY, Christopher Barrett for Appellant Drew Rankin, ADDED. [Entered: 06/13/2023 04:50 PM] |
| Filing 9 FORM B, on behalf of Appellant John Bilda, FILED. Service date 06/13/2023 by ACMS. [23-6608, 23-6559, 23-6609] [Entered: 06/13/2023 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Drew Rankin, FILED. [Entered: 06/13/2023 11:06 AM] |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Drew Rankin, FILED. Service date 06/13/2023 by ACMS. [Entered: 06/13/2023 11:02 AM] |
| Filing 6 FORM B, on behalf of Appellant Drew Rankin, FILED. Service date 06/13/2023 by ACMS. [23-6609, 23-6559, 23-6608] [Entered: 06/13/2023 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 5 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Drew Rankin, district court receipt # 26992, FILED. [Entered: 06/12/2023 07:02 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 06/12/2023 06:52 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTE: See lead case, 23-6559, containing complete set of docket entries. [Entered: 06/12/2023 06:49 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 05/24/2023, RECEIVED. [Entered: 06/12/2023 06:48 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Drew Rankin, FILED. [Entered: 06/12/2023 06:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
