Sanchez v. Lilley
Petitioner: EDGAR SANCHEZ
Respondent: L. LILLEY
Case Number: 23-6832
Filed: July 28, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2023 Filing 16 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 09/19/2023, determining the appeal to EDNY, copy to pro se, ISSUED.[Mandate] [Entered: 10/11/2023 10:26 AM]
September 21, 2023 Filing 15 NOTICE, Case Status, SENT. [Entered: 09/21/2023 01:06 PM]
September 21, 2023 Filing 14 LETTER, dated 09/11/2023, on behalf of Appellant Edgar Sanchez, requesting a copy of the docket sheet, RECEIVED. No Service. [Entered: 09/21/2023 01:01 PM]
September 19, 2023 Filing 13 MOTION ORDER, denying motion to file successive application, at docket entry 8, on behalf of Petitioner Edgar Sanchez, by DC, WJN, AJN, copy to pro se Petitioner, FILED. [Entered: 09/19/2023 01:14 PM]
September 19, 2023 Filing 12 NEW CASE MANAGER, Yana Segal, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 09/19/2023 12:58 PM]
September 6, 2023 Filing 11 PAPERS, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, RECEIVED. [Entered: 09/06/2023 06:07 PM]
August 22, 2023 Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner Edgar Sanchez, FILED. Service date 08/17/2023 by United States Mail. [Entered: 08/22/2023 03:26 PM]
August 22, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION, to file successive application, on behalf of Petitioner Edgar Sanchez, FILED. Service date 08/17/2023 by United States Mail. [Entered: 08/22/2023 03:21 PM]
August 18, 2023 Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Barbara D. Underwood for Respondent L. Lilley, TERMINATED. [Entered: 08/18/2023 03:09 PM]
August 18, 2023 Filing 6 ATTORNEY, Sarah Spatt Rabinowitz in place of attorney Barbara D. Underwood, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 08/18/2023 03:07 PM]
August 18, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of L. Lilley, FILED. [Entered: 08/18/2023 02:51 PM]
August 15, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE, to Respondent Lilley, for failure to file an appearance, SENT. [Entered: 08/15/2023 08:03 PM]
July 28, 2023 Filing 10 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 08/24/2023 01:59 PM]
July 28, 2023 Filing 3 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 07/28/2023 03:30 PM]
July 28, 2023 Filing 2 APPLICATION, for Second or Successive habeas petition, on behalf of Petitioner Edgar Sanchez, OPENED. Notice to Petitioner Edgar Sanchez, requiring filing of application form for second or successive petition, SENT. [Entered: 07/28/2023 03:28 PM]
July 28, 2023 Filing 1 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING, MOTION for an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive application, on behalf of Petitioner Edgar Sanchez, FILED. [Entered: 07/28/2023 03:13 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Sanchez v. Lilley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: EDGAR SANCHEZ
Represented By: Edgar Sanchez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: L. LILLEY
Represented By: Barbara D. Underwood
Represented By: Sarah Spatt Rabinowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?