Lela v. Garland
| BESART LELA |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 23-6919 |
| August 16, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 NEW CASE MANAGER, Tynetta Wilder, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 10/17/2023 10:16 AM] |
| Filing 18 IMMIGRATION 90-DAY TOLLING ORDER, FILED. [Entered: 09/05/2023 05:21 PM] |
| Filing 17 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form C-A, at entry 16, on behalf of Petitioner Besart Lela, FILED. [Entered: 09/05/2023 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 16 FORM C-A, on behalf of Petitioner Besart Lela, FILED. Service date 08/31/2023 by ACMS. [Entered: 08/31/2023 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 15 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment Notice of Appearance Form, at entry 12, on behalf of Petitioner Besart Lela, FILED. [Entered: 08/31/2023 01:52 PM] |
| Filing 14 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form C-A, at docket entry 13, on behalf of Petitioner Besart Lela, FILED. [Entered: 08/31/2023 01:42 PM] |
| Filing 13 FORM C-A, on behalf of Petitioner Besart Lela, FILED. Service date 08/30/2023 by ACMS. [Entered: 08/30/2023 01:37 PM] |
| Filing 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner Besart Lela, FILED. Service date 08/30/2023 by ACMS. [Entered: 08/30/2023 12:53 PM] |
| Filing 11 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, notice of appearance, at docket entry 10, on behalf of Petitioner Besart Lela, FILED. [Entered: 08/30/2023 08:51 AM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Besart Lela, FILED. [Entered: 08/28/2023 06:07 PM] |
| Filing 9 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD, FILED [Entered: 08/28/2023 12:46 PM] |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Lisa Marie Arnold for Respondent Merrick B. Garland, TERMINATED. [Entered: 08/16/2023 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Matthew Allan Spurlock in place of attorney Lisa Marie Arnold, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 08/16/2023 03:09 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 08/16/2023 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 5 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 08/16/2023 09:27 AM] [Edited: 08/21/2023 09:16 AM] |
| Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Petitioner Besart Lela, USCA receipt # A02-1994-ACMS, FILED. [Entered: 08/16/2023 09:20 AM] |
| Filing 3 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Besart Lela, received on 08/15/2023, OPENED. [Entered: 08/16/2023 09:18 AM] [Edited: 08/21/2023 09:14 AM] |
| Filing 2 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Besart Lela, FILED. [Entered: 08/16/2023 09:01 AM] |
| Filing 1 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 07/18/2023, RECEIVED. [Entered: 08/16/2023 09:01 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Lela v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: BESART LELA | |
| Represented By: | Paul B. Grotas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Lisa Marie Arnold |
| Represented By: | Matthew Allan Spurlock |
| Represented By: | Oil Oil |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
