Fredricks v. Whittingham
NIGEL FREDRICKS |
PHILLIP WHITTINGHAM |
23-7103 |
September 14, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER, dated 11/14/2023, dismissing appeal by 12/05/2023, unless Appellant Nigel Fredricks submits Acknowledgement and Notice of Appearance, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 11/14/2023 10:57 AM] |
Filing 15 ORDER, dated 11/14/2023, dismissing appeal by 12/05/2023, unelss Appellant Nigel Fredricks submits fee or moves for in forma pauperis status, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 11/14/2023 10:49 AM] |
Filing 14 ORDER, dated 11/14/2023, dismissing appeal by 12/05/2023, unless Appellant Nigel Fredricks submits Prisoner Authorization form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 11/14/2023 10:37 AM] |
Filing 13 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D-P FILED, at docket entry 11, on behalf of Appellant Nigel Fredricks, FILED. [Entered: 11/03/2023 09:55 AM] |
Filing 12 LETTER, dated 10/18/2023, requesting forms, on behalf of Appellant Nigel Fredricks, RECEIVED. [Entered: 11/01/2023 04:55 PM] [Edited: 11/03/2023 09:44 AM] |
Filing 11 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Nigel Fredricks, FILED. Service date 10/24/2023 by No Service. [Entered: 11/01/2023 04:52 PM] [Edited: 11/03/2023 09:43 AM] |
Filing 9 ORDER, dated 10/10/2023, dismissing appeal by 10/31/2023, unless Appellant Nigel Fredricks submits Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance form, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 10/10/2023 09:57 AM] |
Filing 8 ORDER, dated 10/10/2023, dismissing appeal by 10/31/2023, unless Appellant Nigel Fredricks submits Fee or moves or in forma pauperis status, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 10/10/2023 09:49 AM] |
Filing 7 ORDER, dated 10/10/2023, dismissing appeal by 10/31/2023, unless Appellant Nigel Fredricks submits Form D-P, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 10/10/2023 09:41 AM] |
Filing 10 LETTER, dated 09/15/2023, regarding non-appearance for Appellee Phillip Whittingham, on behalf of Appellee Phillip Whittingham, RECEIVED. Service date 09/15/2023 by Overnight Mail. [Entered: 10/10/2023 10:07 AM] |
Filing 6 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED. [Entered: 09/14/2023 10:37 AM] |
Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 09/14/2023 10:34 AM] |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 09/14/2023 10:32 AM] |
Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 08/07/2023, denying IFP, RECEIVED. [Entered: 09/14/2023 10:25 AM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 08/07/2023, RECEIVED. [Entered: 09/14/2023 10:22 AM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Nigel Fredricks, FILED. [Entered: 09/14/2023 10:20 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Fredricks v. Whittingham | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: NIGEL FREDRICKS | |
Represented By: | Nigel Fredricks |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: PHILLIP WHITTINGHAM | |
Represented By: | Sylvia Hinds-Radix |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.