United States of America v. Ortega
| KAYLEN RAINEY, WILLIAM DRAYTON and JOSEFINA MARINE |
| BILLY ORTEGA, Jason and Sealed Defendant 1 |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 23-7417 |
| October 19, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY, Won S. Shin for Appellee United States of America, TERMINATED. [Entered: 11/14/2023 05:16 PM] |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Danielle Renee Sassoon in place of attorney Won S. Shin, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 11/14/2023 05:11 PM] |
| Filing 7 FORM B, on behalf of Appellant Billy Ortega, FILED. Service date 10/30/2023 by ACMS. [Entered: 10/30/2023 12:17 PM] |
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Billy Ortega, FILED. Service date 10/30/2023 by ACMS. [Entered: 10/30/2023 12:15 PM] |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY, Michael Herman, for AppelleeUSA United States of America, ADDED. [Entered: 10/20/2023 12:26 PM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 10/20/2023 10:53 AM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Billy Ortega, recieved on 10/17/2023, OPENED. [Entered: 10/19/2023 03:38 PM] |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 11/07/2023 12:28 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 10/06/2023, RECEIVED. [Entered: 10/19/2023 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Billy Ortega, FILED. [Entered: 10/19/2023 03:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
