United States of America v. Scott (Greenwood)
| RUJA IGNATOVA, KONSTANTIN IGNATOV, MARK S. SCOTT, Cryptoqueen, Sealed Defendant 1, DAVID R. PIKE, FRANK SCHNEIDER and IRINA DILKINSKA |
| MATTHEW RUSSELL LEE |
| KARL SEBASTIAN GREENWOOD |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 23-7432 |
| October 23, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 FORM B, on behalf of Appellant Matthew Russell Lee, FILED. Service date 11/03/2023 by United States Mail. [Entered: 11/09/2023 05:56 PM] |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Matthew Russell Lee, FILED. Service date 11/03/2023 by United States Mail. [Entered: 11/09/2023 05:55 PM] |
| Filing 6 LETTER, dated 10/31/2023, informing of change of address, on behalf of Appellant Matthew Russell Lee, RECEIVED. Service date 10/31/2023 by No Service. [Entered: 11/02/2023 05:19 PM] |
| Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 10/23/2023 04:45 PM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Matthew Russell Lee, received on 10/11/2023, OPENED. [Entered: 10/23/2023 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Matthew Russell Lee, district court receipt # 21882, FILED. [Entered: 10/23/2023 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 09/07/2023, RECEIVED. [Entered: 10/23/2023 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Matthew Russell Lee, FILED. [Entered: 10/23/2023 04:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
