Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Pa v. Qin
Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Partnership, Huzhou Huihengying Equity Investment Partnership and Huzhou Huirongsheng Equity Investment Partnership |
Hui Qin |
23-747 |
May 1, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other Statutes |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Hui Qin Brief due date as 07/21/2023. Joint Appendix due date as 07/21/2023, FILED.[3534842] [23-747] [Entered: 06/28/2023 10:50 AM] |
Filing 23 NEW CASE MANAGER, Ronald Willoughby, ASSIGNED.[3534739] [23-747] [Entered: 06/28/2023 09:10 AM] |
Filing 20 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Hui Qin, informing Court of proposed due date 07/21/2023, RECEIVED. Service date 05/23/2023 by CM/ECF.[3520387] [23-747] [Entered: 05/23/2023 06:31 PM] |
Filing 19 ATTORNEY, Andrew C. Smith Sr. for Huzhou Huihengying Equity Investment Partnership, Huzhou Huirongsheng Equity Investment Partnership and Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Partnership, in case 23-747, [ # 18 ], ADDED.[3516762] [23-747] [Entered: 05/16/2023 08:50 PM] |
Filing 18 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Partnership, Huzhou Huihengying Equity Investment Partnership and Huzhou Huirongsheng Equity Investment Partnership, FILED. Service date 05/16/2023 by CM/ECF. [3516760] [23-747] [Entered: 05/16/2023 08:48 PM] |
Filing 17 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Investment Management Partnership, Huzhou Huihengying Equity Investment Partnership and Huzhou Huirongsheng Equity Investment Partnership, FILED. Service date 05/16/2023 by CM/ECF.[3516759] [23-747] [Entered: 05/16/2023 08:40 PM] |
Filing 16 CAMP ORDER, Type of Conference: Telephonic, Scheduled Date of Conference: 07/14/2023, Start Time: 10:30 AM, Required Attendees: Clients with Counsel, with Kathleen M. Scanlon, ENTERED.[3514757] [23-747] [Entered: 05/12/2023 12:17 PM] |
Filing 13 ATTORNEY, Xintong Zhang for Hui Qin, in case 23-747, [ # 12 ], ADDED.[3514490] [23-747] [Entered: 05/11/2023 07:23 PM] |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellant Hui Qin, FILED. Service date 05/11/2023 by CM/ECF. [3514457] [23-747] [Entered: 05/11/2023 05:31 PM] |
Filing 11 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Hui Qin, FILED. Service date 05/11/2023 by CM/ECF.[3514453] [23-747] [Entered: 05/11/2023 05:21 PM] |
Filing 10 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Hui Qin, FILED. Service date 05/11/2023 by CM/ECF.[3514430] [23-747] [Entered: 05/11/2023 04:51 PM] |
Filing 9 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Hui Qin, FILED. Service date 05/11/2023 by CM/ECF.[3514428] [23-747] [Entered: 05/11/2023 04:50 PM] |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3510601] [23-747] [Entered: 05/04/2023 08:53 PM] |
Filing 5 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Hui Qin, district court receipt # ANYSDC-27672663, FILED.[3510600] [23-747] [Entered: 05/04/2023 08:52 PM] |
Filing 4 DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND ORDER, dated 03/31/2023, RECEIVED.[3510599] [23-747] [Entered: 05/04/2023 08:52 PM] |
Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 10/11/2022, RECEIVED.[3510598] [23-747] [Entered: 05/04/2023 08:51 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION AND ORDER, dated 09/26/2022, RECEIVED.[3510597] [23-747] [Entered: 05/04/2023 08:50 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Hui Qin, FILED. [3510596] [23-747] [Entered: 05/04/2023 08:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.