Chavez Gonzalez v. Garland
Petitioner: RIGOBERTO ANTONIO CHAVEZ GONZALEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 23-7470
Filed: October 24, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2023 Filing 15 OPPOSITION, to Respondent's Opposition for Stay of Removal, entry 15, on behalf of Petitioner Rigoberto Antonio Chavez Gonzalez, FILED. Service date 11/13/2023 by United States Mail. [Entered: 11/14/2023 11:23 AM]
November 8, 2023 Filing 14 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD, FILED [Entered: 11/08/2023 12:20 PM]
November 7, 2023 Filing 13 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. Service date 11/07/2023 by ACMS. [Entered: 11/07/2023 04:50 PM]
November 3, 2023 Filing 12 OPPOSITION, to Motion FILED, 6, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. Service date 11/03/2023 by ACMS. [Entered: 11/03/2023 03:02 PM]
October 25, 2023 Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE, for (edit by court), on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. Service date 10/25/2023 by United States Mail. [Entered: 10/25/2023 03:25 PM]
October 25, 2023 Filing 10 ATTORNEY, Lisa Marie Arnold for Respondent Merrick B. Garland, TERMINATED. [Entered: 10/25/2023 02:56 PM]
October 25, 2023 Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Nancy Pham in place of attorney Lisa Marie Arnold, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 10/25/2023 02:54 PM]
October 24, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 10/24/2023 04:50 PM]
October 24, 2023 Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 10/24/2023 10:13 AM]
October 24, 2023 Filing 4 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 10/24/2023 10:10 AM]
October 24, 2023 Filing 3 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Rigoberto Antonio Chavez Gonzalez, received on 10/23/2023, OPENED. [Entered: 10/24/2023 10:06 AM]
October 23, 2023 Filing 7 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Petitioner Rigoberto Antonio Chavez Gonzalez, FILED. Service date 10/23/2023 by United States Mail. [Entered: 10/24/2023 11:27 AM]
October 23, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION, for stay of removal, on behalf of Petitioner Rigoberto Antonio Chavez Gonzalez, FILED. Service date 10/23/2023 by United States Mail. [Entered: 10/24/2023 11:23 AM]
October 23, 2023 Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 10/02/2023, RECEIVED. [Entered: 10/24/2023 10:01 AM]
October 23, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Rigoberto Antonio Chavez Gonzalez, FILED. [Entered: 10/24/2023 10:01 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Chavez Gonzalez v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: RIGOBERTO ANTONIO CHAVEZ GONZALEZ
Represented By: Rigoberto Antonio Chavez Gonzalez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Nancy Pham
Represented By: Oil Oil
Represented By: Lisa Marie Arnold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?