ELG Utica Alloys, Inc. v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
| NATIONAL GRID GROUP PLC |
| ELG UTICA ALLOYS, INC. |
| NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP., DBA National Grid, SPECIAL METALS CORP., GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, EMPIRE RECYCLING CORP and CHICAGO PNEUMATIC TOOL COMPANY, LLC |
| CBS CORPORATION, (successorininterest to Westinghouse Electric Corporation) AKA Paramount Global |
| 23-7575 |
| October 31, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 ELG Utica Alloys, Inc. v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment Notice of Appearance Form, at docket entry 18, on behalf of Appellee Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., FILED. [Entered: 11/14/2023 09:01 PM] |
| Filing 20 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, notice of appearance, at docket entry 14, on behalf of Appellant ELG Utica Alloys, Inc., FILED. [Entered: 11/14/2023 08:55 PM] |
| Filing 19 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, notice of appearance, at docket entry 13, on behalf of Appellant ELG Utica Alloys, Inc., FILED. [Entered: 11/14/2023 08:49 PM] |
| Filing 18 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., FILED. Service date 11/10/2023 by ACMS. [Entered: 11/10/2023 11:10 AM] |
| Filing 17 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant ELG Utica Alloys, Inc., FILED. Service date 11/08/2023 by ACMS. [Entered: 11/08/2023 04:13 PM] |
| Filing 16 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant ELG Utica Alloys, Inc., FILED. Service date 11/08/2023 by ACMS. [Entered: 11/08/2023 04:11 PM] |
| Filing 15 ATTORNEY, Steven W. Zoffer, for Appellant ELG Utica Alloys, Inc., ADDED. [Entered: 11/08/2023 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of ELG Utica Alloys, Inc., FILED. [Entered: 11/08/2023 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of ELG Utica Alloys, Inc., FILED. [Entered: 11/08/2023 01:43 PM] |
| Filing 12 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 11/06/2023 05:31 AM] |
| Filing 11 ATTORNEY, James Patrick Youngs, for Appellee Special Metals Corp., ADDED. [Entered: 11/03/2023 09:38 PM] |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Special Metals Corp., FILED. [Entered: 11/03/2023 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 9 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, notice of appearance, at entry 7, on behalf of Appellee General Electric Company, FILED. [Entered: 11/01/2023 02:22 PM] |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Kristin Carter Rowe, for Appellee General Electric Company, ADDED. [Entered: 11/01/2023 02:21 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of General Electric Company, FILED. [Entered: 11/01/2023 01:57 PM] |
| Filing 6 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, notice of appearance, at docket entry 5, on behalf of Appellee General Electric Company, FILED. [Entered: 11/01/2023 01:11 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of General Electric Company, FILED. [Entered: 11/01/2023 10:44 AM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant ELG Utica Alloys, Inc., received on 10/27/2023, OPENED. [Entered: 10/31/2023 03:01 PM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant ELG Utica Alloys, Inc., district court receipt # BNYNDC-6490400, FILED. [Entered: 10/31/2023 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 10/02/2023, RECEIVED. [Entered: 10/31/2023 02:48 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant ELG Utica Alloys, Inc., FILED. [Entered: 10/31/2023 02:46 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
