Forte v. McNellis
DANIEL FORTE |
Detective BRIAN MCNELLIS, Shield #5286, Detective EDWARD GARRITY, Shield #7920, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF NEW YORK, THE CITY OF WHITE PLAINS, Detective STEVEN NIEVES, Shield #07868, Detective MICHAEL MCCREADY, Shield #02084, Detective JOHN DOE, New York Police Dept.(TARU Unit), Officer TALLEVI, Officer CUNNINGHAM, Sgt. MCLOUGHLIN, Shield #05097 and Detective TIMOTHY GENTZ, Shield #06014, Jointly and Severally, Individually and in Their Official Capacity |
23-7716 |
November 9, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion to proceed in forma pauperis, at docket entry 5, on behalf of Appellant Daniel Forte, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 11/13/2023 12:18 PM] |
Filing 8 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 11/13/2023 10:17 AM] |
Filing 7 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED. [Entered: 11/13/2023 10:07 AM] |
Filing 6 PRISONER APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Daniel Forte, received on 11/06/2023, OPENED. [Entered: 11/09/2023 02:32 PM] |
Filing 5 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Daniel Forte, FILED. No service. [Entered: 11/09/2023 02:28 PM] |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 11/09/2023 02:26 PM] |
Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 09/26/2023, RECEIVED. [Entered: 11/09/2023 02:23 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 09/26/2023, RECEIVED. [Entered: 11/09/2023 02:21 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Daniel Forte, FILED. [Entered: 11/09/2023 02:19 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.