Hauschild v. United States Marshals Service
Daniel F. Hauschild |
United States Marshals Service |
23-778 |
May 5, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other Statutes |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 MOTION, to extend time, on behalf of Appellee United States Marshals Service, FILED. Service date 07/02/2023 by CM/ECF. [3536697] [23-778] [Entered: 07/02/2023 10:56 PM] |
Filing 30 BRIEF, on behalf of Appellant Daniel F. Hauschild, FILED. Service date 06/26/2023 by CM/ECF.[3533658] [23-778] [Entered: 06/26/2023 12:47 PM] |
Filing 29 APPENDIX, volume 1 of 1, (pp. 1-119), on behalf of Appellant Daniel F. Hauschild, FILED. Service date 06/26/2023 by CM/ECF.[3533653] [23-778] [Entered: 06/26/2023 12:46 PM] |
Filing 28 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee United States Marshals Service, FILED. Service date 05/22/2023 by CM/ECF.[3519654] [23-778] [Entered: 05/22/2023 05:34 PM] |
Filing 27 LOCAL RULE 31.2 NOTICE, placing this appeal on the Court's Expedited Calendar, setting appellant's brief due date as 06/26/2023, appellee's brief due date as 07/31/2023,TRANSMITTED.[3519390] [23-778] [Entered: 05/22/2023 01:24 PM] |
Filing 26 NEW CASE MANAGER, Dennisse Pizarro-Lebron, ASSIGNED.[3519384] [23-778] [Entered: 05/22/2023 01:17 PM] |
Filing 19 CURED DEFECTIVE Form C [ # 17 ], [ # 18 ], on behalf of Appellant Daniel F. Hauschild, FILED.[3518745] [23-778] [Entered: 05/19/2023 03:13 PM] |
Filing 18 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Daniel F. Hauschild, FILED. Service date 05/19/2023 by CM/ECF.[3518650] [23-778] [Entered: 05/19/2023 01:14 PM] |
Filing 17 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, FORM C, [14], on behalf of Appellant Daniel F. Hauschild, FILED.[3517368] [23-778] [Entered: 05/17/2023 03:52 PM] |
Filing 16 ATTORNEY, Christine S. Poscablo for United States Marshals Service, in case 23-778 , [ # 13 ], ADDED.[3517364] [23-778] [Entered: 05/17/2023 03:49 PM] |
Filing 15 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Daniel F. Hauschild, FILED. Service date 05/17/2023 by CM/ECF.[3517138] [23-778] [Entered: 05/17/2023 12:09 PM] |
Filing 14 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Daniel F. Hauschild, FILED. Service date 05/17/2023 by CM/ECF.[3517135] [23-778] [Entered: 05/17/2023 12:08 PM] |
Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee United States Marshals Service, FILED. Service date 05/16/2023 by CM/ECF. [3516224] [23-778] [Entered: 05/16/2023 10:51 AM] |
Filing 12 ATTORNEY, Matthew Edward Stolz for Daniel F. Hauschild, in case 23-778, [ # 10 ], ADDED.[3514758] [23-778] [Entered: 05/12/2023 12:19 PM] |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellant Daniel F. Hauschild, FILED. Service date 05/11/2023 by CM/ECF. [3513892] [23-778] [Entered: 05/11/2023 10:35 AM] |
Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Daniel F. Hauschild, FILED. Service date 05/11/2023 by CM/ECF.[3513881] [23-778] [Entered: 05/11/2023 10:17 AM] |
Filing 11 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3514331] [23-778] [Entered: 05/11/2023 03:25 PM] |
Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Daniel F. Hauschild, district court receipt # ANYSDC-27702353, FILED.[3513192] [23-778] [Entered: 05/10/2023 11:00 AM] |
Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 03/08/2023, RECEIVED.[3513189] [23-778] [Entered: 05/10/2023 10:57 AM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT OPINION & ORDER, dated 03/08/2023, RECEIVED.[3513188] [23-778] [Entered: 05/10/2023 10:57 AM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Daniel F. Hauschild, FILED. [3513185] [23-778] [Entered: 05/10/2023 10:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.