Tumailli-Granizo v. Garland
DAFINE JOHNSU TUMAILLI-MATUTE, ERIK ANDERSON TUMAILLI-MATUTE, JUAN OSWALDO TUMAILLI-GRANIZO, CARMITA ROCIO MATUTE-ATIENCIA and RIHANA ANGELINA TUMAILLI-MATUTE |
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL |
23-7794 |
November 20, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 11/20/2023 11:06 AM] |
Filing 5 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 11/20/2023 10:25 AM] |
Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Petitioner Carmita Rocio Matute-Atiencia, Petitioner Dafine Johnsu Tumailli-Matute, Petitioner Erik Anderson Tumailli-Matute, Petitioner Juan Oswaldo Tumailli-Granizo, Petitioner Rihana Angelina Tumailli-Matute, USCA receipt # A02-2280-ACMS, FILED. [Entered: 11/20/2023 10:16 AM] |
Filing 3 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Carmita Rocio Matute-Atiencia, Petitioner Dafine Johnsu Tumailli-Matute, Petitioner Erik Anderson Tumailli-Matute, Petitioner Juan Oswaldo Tumailli-Granizo, Petitioner Rihana Angelina Tumailli-Matute, received on 11/16/2023, OPENED. [Entered: 11/20/2023 10:15 AM] |
Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 10/20/2023, RECEIVED. [Entered: 11/20/2023 10:02 AM] |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Carmita Rocio Matute-Atiencia, Petitioner Dafine Johnsu Tumailli-Matute, Petitioner Erik Anderson Tumailli-Matute, Petitioner Juan Oswaldo Tumailli-Granizo, Petitioner RIHANA ANGELINA TUMAILLI-MATUTE, FILED. [Entered: 11/20/2023 10:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.