Paucar Guaman v. Garland
| LUIS ALFREDO PAUCAR GUAMAN, ANA LUCIA MORA SUQUILANDA and MELANY GISSELLE PAUCAR MORA |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 23-7889 |
| December 1, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Lisa Marie Arnold for Merrick B. Garland, TERMINATED. [Entered: 12/01/2023 08:16 PM] |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Erik R. Quick in place of attorney Lisa Marie Arnold, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 12/01/2023 08:14 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 12/01/2023 12:09 PM] |
| Filing 5 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 12/01/2023 08:17 AM] |
| Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Petitioner Ana Lucia Mora Suquilanda, Petitioner Luis Alfredo Paucar Guaman, Petitioner Melany Gisselle Paucar Mora, USCA receipt # A02-2315-ACMS, received on 11/28/2023, FILED. [Entered: 12/01/2023 08:13 AM] |
| Filing 3 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Ana Lucia Mora Suquilanda, Petitioner Luis Alfredo Paucar Guaman, Petitioner Melany Gisselle Paucar Mora, received on 11/28/2023, OPENED. [Entered: 12/01/2023 08:12 AM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 11/08/2023, RECEIVED. [Entered: 12/01/2023 08:07 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Ana Lucia Mora Suquilanda, Petitioner Luis Alfredo Paucar Guaman, Petitioner Melany Gisselle Paucar Mora, FILED. [Entered: 12/01/2023 08:07 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
