Orrego v. Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP
| JOHN DOE and JANE DOE |
| LIDIA M. ORREGO, - |
| PASTERNACK TILKER ZIEGLER WALSH STANTON & ROMANO LLP, PASTERNACK TILKER WEITZ & LUXENBERG LLP, FIRST CHOICE EVALUATIONS LLC and JASON HOCHFELDER, MD |
| 23-7928 |
| December 5, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Jenifer Ann Scarcella, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 12/05/2023 05:28 PM] |
| Filing 7 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 12/05/2023 05:24 PM] |
| Filing 6 INTERLOCUTORY CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Lidia M. Orrego, received on 11/29/2023, OPENED. [Entered: 12/05/2023 05:21 PM] |
| Filing 5 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Lidia M. Orrego, district court receipt # 200002639, FILED. [Entered: 12/05/2023 05:16 PM] |
| Filing 4 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, entered in the district court as docket entry dated 11/14/2023, RECEIVED. [Entered: 12/05/2023 05:13 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, entered in the district court as docket entry dated 10/30/2023, RECEIVED. [Entered: 12/05/2023 05:10 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, entered in the district court as docket entry dated 10/30/2023, RECEIVED. [Entered: 12/05/2023 05:08 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Lidia M. Orrego, FILED. [Entered: 12/05/2023 05:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
