Arqui-Malan v. Garland
| MARIA MARTHA ARQUI-MALAN, JORDY DAVID CAGUANO-ARQUI and GENESIS DAYANNA CAGUANO-ARQUI |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 23-8048 |
| December 19, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Lisa Marie Arnold for Respondent Merrick B. Garland, TERMINATED. [Entered: 12/19/2023 01:37 PM] |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Zachary Scott Hughbanks in place of attorney Lisa Marie Arnold, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 12/19/2023 01:34 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 12/19/2023 01:05 PM] |
| Filing 5 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 12/19/2023 11:28 AM] |
| Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Petitioner Genesis Dayanna Caguano-Arqui, Petitioner Jordy David Caguano-Arqui, Petitioner Maria Martha Arqui-Malan, USCA receipt # A02-2364-ACMS, FILED. [Entered: 12/19/2023 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 3 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Genesis Dayanna Caguano-Arqui, Petitioner Jordy David Caguano-Arqui, Petitioner Maria Martha Arqui-Malan, received on 12/15/2023, OPENED. [Entered: 12/19/2023 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 11/17/2023, RECEIVED. [Entered: 12/19/2023 11:16 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Genesis Dayanna Caguano-Arqui, Petitioner Jordy David Caguano-Arqui, Petitioner Maria Martha Arqui-Malan, FILED. [Entered: 12/19/2023 11:16 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
