Richards v. City of New York Comptroller
City of New York Comptroller, New York City Law Department, Mr. Bill De Blasio, in his offficial capacity of Mayor, City of New York and Mr. Scott Stringer, in his official capacity, Comptroller, NYC |
Alroy Richards |
City of New York, Attn: Corporation Counsel, Police Officer Mr. John Pastoriza, 1st Precinct, NYPD and Police Officer Mr. D. Saroff, 70th Precinct |
23-956 |
June 29, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
CIVIL RIGHTS-Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 CURED DEFECTIVE FORM D-P, [ # 25 ], on behalf of Appellant Alroy Richards, FILED.[3545700] [23-956] [Entered: 07/24/2023 02:16 PM] |
Filing 26 CURED DEFECTIVE MOTION, TO HOLD APPEAL IN ABEYANCE, [ # 23 ], on behalf of Appellant Alroy Richards, FILED.[3545699] [23-956] [Entered: 07/24/2023 02:16 PM] |
Filing 25 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Alroy Richards, FILED. Service date 07/22/2023 by US mail.[3545698] [23-956] [Entered: 07/24/2023 02:16 PM] |
Filing 23 MOTION, to hold appeal in abeyance, on behalf of Appellant Alroy Richards, FILED. Service date 07/22/2023 by US mail.[3545695] [23-956] [Entered: 07/24/2023 02:13 PM] |
Filing 22 PAPERS, tolling request, RECEIVED.[3544383] [23-956] [Entered: 07/20/2023 11:11 AM] |
Filing 21 ATTORNEY, Rebecca Visgaitis, [ # 20 ], in place of attorney Sylvia Hinds-Radix, SUBSTITUTED.[3543044] [23-956] [Entered: 07/18/2023 12:34 PM] |
Filing 20 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL, on behalf of Appellee City of New York, John Pastoriza and D. Saroff, FILED. Service date 07/18/2023 by US mail. [3543001] [23-956] [Entered: 07/18/2023 11:31 AM] |
Filing 19 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, to hold appeal in abeyance, [18], on behalf of Appellant Alroy Richards, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3542756] [23-956] [Entered: 07/17/2023 08:40 PM] |
Filing 18 MOTION, to hold appeal in abeyance, on behalf of Appellant Alroy Richards, FILED. Service date 07/16/2023 by US mail.[3542755] [23-956] [Entered: 07/17/2023 08:38 PM] |
Filing 17 NOTICE, to Appellees City of New York, John Pastoriza and D. Saroff, for failure to file an appearance, SENT.[3542095] [23-956] [Entered: 07/14/2023 06:18 PM] |
Filing 15 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form D-P, [11], on behalf of Appellant Alroy Richards, copy to pro se appellant, FILED.[3541081] [23-956] [Entered: 07/13/2023 03:21 PM] |
Filing 14 PAPERS, Form D, RECEIVED.[3541078] [23-956] [Entered: 07/13/2023 03:16 PM] |
Filing 13 PAPERS, Acknowledgment and Notice of Appearance Form, RECEIVED.[3540679] [23-956] [Entered: 07/12/2023 05:59 PM] |
Filing 11 FORM D-P, on behalf of Appellant Alroy Richards, FILED. Service date 07/03/2023 by US mail.[3538068] [23-956] [Entered: 07/06/2023 03:26 PM] |
Filing 10 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FORM, on behalf of Party Alroy Richards, FILED. Service date 07/06/2023 by US mail.[3538067] [23-956] [Entered: 07/06/2023 03:25 PM] |
Filing 9 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED.[3537017] [23-956] [Entered: 07/05/2023 11:13 AM] |
Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT.[3536048] [23-956] [Entered: 06/29/2023 08:24 PM] |
Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Alroy Richards, district court receipt # 17882, FILED.[3536047] [23-956] [Entered: 06/29/2023 08:23 PM] |
Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 06/16/2023, RECEIVED.[3536046] [23-956] [Entered: 06/29/2023 08:22 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, dated 05/30/2023, RECEIVED.[3536045] [23-956] [Entered: 06/29/2023 08:22 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Alroy Richards, FILED. [3536044] [23-956] [Entered: 06/29/2023 08:17 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.