Harris v. The City of New York
| ISHMAEL C. HARRIS, YUSUF A. HARRIS, GREGORY S. HARRIS and ORAL S. SINCLAIR |
| THE CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANDREW DIETZ, New York City Police Department Detective, VINCENT PRICE, New York City Police Department Detective, EUGENE GOTTWIN, New York City Police Department Detective, CHRISTINE FORTUNE, New York City Police Department Detective, JOSEPH NEENAN, New York City Police Department Detective, DARCEL CLARK, Bronx County District Attorney, FELICITY LUNG, Bronx County Assistant District Attorney and ALLEN KAREN, Bronx County Assistant District Attorney |
| 24-1004 |
| April 17, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, motion to proceed in forma pauperis, at docket entry 6, on behalf of Appellant Ishmael C. Harris, FILED. [Entered: 04/17/2024 08:19 PM] |
| Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 04/17/2024 06:30 PM] |
| Filing 4 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Ishmael C. Harris, received 04/16/2024, OPENED. [Entered: 04/17/2024 06:17 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Ishmael C. Harris, FILED. Service date 04/16/2024 by No Service. [Entered: 04/17/2024 06:32 PM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 04/17/2024 06:10 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 03/12/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 04/17/2024 05:08 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Ishmael C. Harris, FILED. [Entered: 04/17/2024 05:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
