Puculpala-Morocho v. Garland
| JOSE MANUEL PUCULPALA-MOROCHO, JONATHON CALEB PUCULPALA-AGUALSACA, KEVIN ALEXANDER ANDAGANA-AGUALSACA, MIRIAM AGUALSACA-GARZA and ALISSON JULIETH PUCULPALA-AGUALSACA |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 24-1047 |
| April 22, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Lisa Marie Arnold for Respondent Merrick B. Garland, TERMINATED. [Entered: 04/24/2024 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY, Elizabeth Dewar in place of attorney Lisa Marie Arnold, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 04/24/2024 01:37 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 04/24/2024 11:35 AM] |
| Filing 4 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 04/22/2024 02:02 PM] |
| Filing 3 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Jose Manuel Puculpala-Morocho, Petitioner Jonathon Caleb Puculpala-Agualsaca, Petitioner Alisson Julieth Puculpala-Agualsaca, Petitioner Kevin Alexander Andagana-Agualsaca, Petitioner Miriam Agualsaca-Garza, received on 04/20/2024, OPENED. [Entered: 04/22/2024 01:52 PM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 03/21/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 04/22/2024 01:38 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Alisson Julieth Puculpala-Agualsaca, Petitioner Jonathon Caleb Puculpala-Agualsaca, Petitioner Jose Manuel Puculpala-Morocho, Petitioner Kevin Alexander Andagana-Agualsaca, Petitioner Miriam Agualsaca-Garza, FILED. [Entered: 04/22/2024 01:38 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
