Sanchez-Portillo v. Garland
| CRISTIAN SANCHEZ-PORTILLO, KAREN YANES-SANTOS, ZOE MATUTE-YANES and WALTER SANCHEZ-YANES |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 24-1117 |
| April 26, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Lisa Marie Arnold for Respondent Merrick B. Garland, TERMINATED. [Entered: 04/29/2024 09:03 AM] |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Alanna Thanh Duong in place of attorney Lisa Marie Arnold, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 04/29/2024 09:01 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 04/29/2024 05:28 AM] |
| Filing 5 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Cristian Sanchez-Portillo, Karen Yanes-Santos, Zoe Matute-Yanes, Walter Sanchez-Yanes, USCA receipt number: A02-2855-ACMS. [Entered: 04/26/2024 03:55 PM] |
| Filing 4 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 04/26/2024 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 3 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Cristian Sanchez-Portillo, Petitioner Karen Yanes-Santos, Petitioner Zoe Matute-Yanes, Petitioner Walter Sanchez-Yanes, received on 04/25/2024, OPENED. [Entered: 04/26/2024 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 03/26/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 04/26/2024 02:33 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Cristian Sanchez-Portillo, Petitioner Karen Yanes-Santos, Petitioner Walter Sanchez-Yanes, Petitioner Zoe Matute-Yanes, FILED. [Entered: 04/26/2024 02:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
