Lema-Tenesaca v. Garland
Petitioner: MARTIN SEBASTIAN LEMA-TENESACA, CARLA DANIELA QUIZHPI-FAICAN and DOMENICA ISABELLA LEMA-QUIZHPI
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 24-1118
Filed: April 26, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 29, 2024 Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 04/29/2024 03:27 PM]
April 29, 2024 Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 04/29/2024 01:55 PM]
April 29, 2024 Filing 8 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, notice of appearance, at docket entry 7, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 04/29/2024 12:53 PM]
April 29, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 04/29/2024 10:50 AM]
April 29, 2024 Filing 6 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, notice of appearance, at docket entry 5, on behalf of Respondent Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 04/29/2024 09:58 AM]
April 29, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 04/29/2024 09:15 AM]
April 26, 2024 Filing 4 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 04/26/2024 03:24 PM]
April 26, 2024 Filing 3 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Martin Sebastian Lema-Tenesaca, Carla Daniela Quizhpi-Faican, Domenica Isabella Lema-Quizhpi, received on 04/25/2024, OPENED. [Entered: 04/26/2024 03:18 PM]
April 25, 2024 Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 03/27/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 04/26/2024 03:01 PM]
April 25, 2024 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Carla Daniela Quizhpi-Faican, Petitioner Domenica Isabella Lema-Quizhpi, Petitioner Martin Sebastian Lema-Tenesaca, FILED. [Entered: 04/26/2024 03:01 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lema-Tenesaca v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MARTIN SEBASTIAN LEMA-TENESACA
Represented By: Michael Anthony Borja
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: CARLA DANIELA QUIZHPI-FAICAN
Represented By: Michael Anthony Borja
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: DOMENICA ISABELLA LEMA-QUIZHPI
Represented By: Michael Anthony Borja
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Lisa Marie Arnold
Represented By: Oil Oil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?