Crespo v. Carvajal
| DAVID CRESPO, ANTHONY PODIAS, PEDRO ESPADA, JR., ROLFI ESPINAL, KESNEL JUSTE and ANTHONY JOSEPH |
| MICHAEL CARVAJAL, Northeast Regional Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, WARDEN HERMAN QUAY, III, Former Warden, MDC Brooklyn, KIMBERLY ASK-CARLSON, Former Warden, MDC Brooklyn, GERARD TRAVERS, Health Services Administrator, WAYNE DECKER, Former Food Service Administrator, HUGH HURWITZ, Acting Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, MARY LOU COMER, Food Service Administrator, MDC Brooklyn, HERBITO TELLEZ, Warden, MDC Brooklyn, MARK S. INCH and THOMAS R. KANE |
| CHENSHIN CHAN and DAVID NAGY |
| 24-1138 |
| April 29, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 PRISONER APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Anthony Joseph, Anthony Podias, Chenshin Chan, David Crespo, David Nagy, Kesnel Juste, Pedro Espada, Jr., Rolfi Espinal, OPENED. [Entered: 04/29/2024 04:19 PM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 04/29/2024 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Anthony Joseph, Anthony Podias, Chenshin Chan, David Crespo, David Nagy, Kesnel Juste, Pedro Espada, Jr., Rolfi Espinal, district court receipt #ANYEDC-17802494, FILED. [Entered: 04/29/2024 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 03/12/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 04/29/2024 03:56 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Anthony Joseph, Anthony Podias, Chenshin Chan, David Crespo, David Nagy, Kesnel Juste, Pedro Espada, Jr., Rolfi Espinal, FILED. [Entered: 04/29/2024 03:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
