United States of America v. Carvajal-Barrios (Alcala Cordones)
HUGO ARMANDO CARVAJAL-BARRIOS, LUCIANO MARIN ARANGO, SEUXIS PAUCIS HERNANDEZ SOLARTE, CLIVER ANTONIO ALCALA CORDONES, El Pollo, NICOLAS MADURO MOROS, Ivan Marquez, DIOSADO CABELLO RONDON and Jesus Santrich |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
24-1152 |
April 30, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ATTORNEY, Nicholas Sutherland Bradley, for Appellee United States of America, ADDED [Entered: 05/01/2024 09:52 AM] |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Kaylan Lasky, for Appellee United States of America, ADDED. [Entered: 05/01/2024 09:49 AM] |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 04/30/2024 06:42 PM] |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 04/30/2024 06:35 PM] |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY, Amy Busa for Appellee United States of America, TERMINATED. [Entered: 04/30/2024 04:04 PM] |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY, Danielle Renee Sassoon in place of attorney Amy Busa, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 04/30/2024 04:02 PM] |
Filing 3 CRIMINAL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Cliver Antonio Alcala Cordones, received on 04/26/2024, OPENED. [Entered: 04/30/2024 02:59 PM] |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 04/30/2024 03:03 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 04/11/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 04/30/2024 02:55 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CRIMINAL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Cliver Antonio Alcala Cordones, FILED. [Entered: 04/30/2024 02:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.