Komatsu v. The City of New York
| TOWAKI KOMATSU |
| THE CITY OF NEW YORK, LISA FITZPATRICK, sued in their individual and official capacities, NIGEL MARKS, sued in their individual and official capacities, VINCENT PULLO, sued in their individual and official capacities, MOLLY PARK, in her capacity as the Commissioner of the New York City Department of Social Services, ANN MARIE SCALIA, sued in their individual and official capacities, SAMUEL SPITZBERG, sued in their individual and official capacities, DANIEL W. TIETZ, in his capacity as the Commissioner of the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, TOP CHOICE MEAT MARKET CORP., JOHN DOE, Top Choice Owner and Z&H CLEANERS |
| 24-1309 |
| May 15, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Ann Marie Scalia, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 05/15/2024 04:10 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER, dated 05/15/2024, dismissing appeal by 06/05/2024, unless Petitioner Towaki Komatsu, submits a motion for leave to file, copy to pro se petitioner, FILED. [Entered: 05/15/2024 04:04 PM]
|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 05/15/2024 03:54 PM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 04/15/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 05/15/2024 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 04/15/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 05/15/2024 03:50 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Petitioner Towaki Komatsu, RECEIVED. [Entered: 05/15/2024 03:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
