Morales Alarcon v. Garland
| HECTOR MARCIAL MORALES ALARCON |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 24-1323 |
| May 16, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY, Lisa Marie Arnold for Respondent Merrick B. Garland, TERMINATED. [Entered: 05/17/2024 07:56 PM] |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Anthony Cardozo Payne, for Respondent Merrick B. Garland, ADDED. [Entered: 05/17/2024 07:05 PM] |
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Raya Jarawan in place of attorney Lisa Marie Arnold, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 05/17/2024 06:57 PM] |
| Filing 7 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER dated 04/15/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 05/17/2024 11:45 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 05/17/2024 09:18 AM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 05/17/2024 09:16 AM] |
| Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Hector Marcial Morales Alarcon, USCA receipt number: A02-2994-ACMS. [Entered: 05/16/2024 03:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 05/16/2024 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 2 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Hector Marcial Morales Alarcon, received on 05/14/2024, OPENED. [Entered: 05/16/2024 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Hector Marcial Morales Alarcon, FILED. [Entered: 05/16/2024 03:14 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
