Jarrin Sancho v. Garland
| CHRISTIAN JARRIN SANCHO, JOHANNA PRICILA ALVARRACIN NAVAS and NOAH KRISTINE JARRIN-ALVARRACIN |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 24-176 |
| January 19, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Lisa Marie Arnold for Respondent Merrick B. Garland, TERMINATED. [Entered: 01/22/2024 04:31 PM] |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Edward Clark Durant in place of attorney Lisa Marie Arnold, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 01/22/2024 04:21 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 01/22/2024 11:58 AM] |
| Filing 5 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 01/19/2024 05:04 PM] |
| Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Petitioner Christian Jarrin Sancho, Petitioner Johanna Pricila Alvarracin Navas, Petitioner Noah Kristine Jarrin-Alvarracin, USCA receipt # B02-2438-ACMS, FILED. [Entered: 01/19/2024 04:59 PM] |
| Filing 3 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Christian Jarrin Sancho, Petitioner Johanna Pricila Alvarracin Navas, Petitioner Noah Kristine Jarrin-Alvarracin, received on 01/17/2024, OPENED. [Entered: 01/19/2024 04:57 PM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 01/03/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 01/19/2024 04:51 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Christian Jarrin Sancho, Petitioner Johanna Pricila Alvarracin Navas, Petitioner Noah Kristine Jarrin-Alvarracin, FILED. [Entered: 01/19/2024 04:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
