Ramos Jimenez v. Garland
| SANDRA NOHEMY ROJAS MEJIA, JOSE ALFREDO RAMOS JIMENEZ and J. A. R. |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 24-2079 |
| August 7, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ATTORNEY, Lisa Marie Arnold for Respondent Merrick B. Garland, TERMINATED. [Entered: 08/07/2024 11:59 AM] |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Lauren Leigh Taiclet in place of attorney Lisa Marie Arnold, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 08/07/2024 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 08/07/2024 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 4 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 08/07/2024 10:41 AM] |
| Filing 3 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Jose Alfredo Ramos Jimenez, Petitioner Sandra Nohemy Rojas Mejia, Petitioner J. A. R., received on 08/05/2024, OPENED. [Entered: 08/07/2024 10:32 AM] |
| Filing 6 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Petitioner Jose Alfredo Ramos Jimenez, Petitioner Sandra Nohemy Rojas Mejia, Petitioner J. A. R., USCA receipt # A02-3262-ACMS, FILED. [Entered: 08/07/2024 11:48 AM] |
| Filing 2 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Jose Alfredo Ramos Jimenez, Petitioner Sandra Nohemy Rojas Mejia, Petitioner J. A. R., FILED. [Entered: 08/07/2024 10:13 AM] |
| Filing 1 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 07/10/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 08/07/2024 10:13 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
