Cardenas Zepeda v. Garland
| DANNIA YOSELYN CARDENAS ZEPEDA and LEONEL ANDRE BETANCO-CARDENAS |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 24-215 |
| January 25, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, FILED. [Entered: 01/26/2024 10:11 AM] |
| Filing 7 FORM C-A, on behalf of Petitioner Dannia Yoselyn Cardenas Zepeda, Petitioner Leonel Andre Betanco-Cardenas, FILED. Service date 01/25/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 01/25/2024 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner Dannia Yoselyn Cardenas Zepeda, Petitioner Leonel Andre Betanco-Cardenas, FILED. Service date 01/25/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 01/25/2024 10:26 AM] |
| Filing 5 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, SERVED. [Entered: 01/25/2024 10:25 AM] |
| Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Petitioner Dannia Yoselyn Cardenas Zepeda, Petitioner Leonel Andre Betanco-Cardenas, USCA receipt # A02-2447-ACMS, FILED. [Entered: 01/25/2024 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 3 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Dannia Yoselyn Cardenas Zepeda, Petitioner Leonel Andre Betanco-Cardenas, received on 01/19/2024, OPENED. [Entered: 01/25/2024 10:13 AM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION AND ORDER, dated 12/20/2023, RECEIVED. [Entered: 01/25/2024 10:02 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AGENCY ORDER, on behalf of Petitioner Dannia Yoselyn Cardenas Zepeda, Petitioner Leonel Andre Betanco-Cardenas, FILED. [Entered: 01/25/2024 10:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
