Greene v. Waterbury Police Dept.
| EDWARD GREENE |
| PAUL CHARETTE, Officer, WATERBURY POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF WATERBURY, NATHAN SHEEHAN, Officer and JAMES MCMAHON, Officer |
| 24-2255 |
| August 28, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 09/17/2024, determining the appeal to District of Connecticut, ISSUED.[Mandate] [Entered: 09/17/2024 11:45 AM] |
| Filing 21 FRAP 42 STIPULATION, with prejudice, FILED. [Entered: 09/17/2024 11:40 AM] |
| Filing 20 NEW CASE MANAGER, Yana Segal, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 09/17/2024 11:35 AM] |
| Filing 19 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, FRAP 42(b) stipulation with prejudice, at entry 18, on behalf of Appellant James McMahon, Appellant Paul Charette, FILED. [Entered: 09/16/2024 12:08 PM] |
| Filing 18 FRAP 42 STIPULATION, With Prejudice, RECEIVED. Service date 09/16/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 09/16/2024 12:00 PM] |
| Filing 17 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, FRAP 42(b) stipulation with prejudice, at docket entry 16, on behalf of Appellant James McMahon, Appellant Paul Charette, FILED. [Entered: 09/16/2024 10:41 AM] |
| Filing 16 FRAP 42 STIPULATION, With Prejudice, RECEIVED. Service date 09/13/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 09/13/2024 04:47 PM] |
| Filing 15 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form C FILED, at docket entry 12, on behalf of Appellant James McMahon, Appellant Paul Charette, FILED. [Entered: 09/12/2024 02:03 PM] |
| Filing 14 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant James McMahon, Appellant Paul Charette, FILED. Service date 09/10/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 09/10/2024 10:17 AM] |
| Filing 13 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant James McMahon, Appellant Paul Charette, FILED. Service date 09/10/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 09/10/2024 10:15 AM] |
| Filing 12 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant James McMahon, Appellant Paul Charette, FILED. Service date 09/10/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 09/10/2024 09:55 AM] |
| Filing 11 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form C FILED, at docket entry 8, and docket entry 9, on behalf of Appellant James McMahon, Appellant Paul Charette, FILED. [Entered: 09/09/2024 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 10 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant James McMahon, Appellant Paul Charette, FILED. Service date 09/06/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 09/06/2024 04:48 PM] |
| Filing 9 FORM C-A, on behalf of Appellant James McMahon, Appellant Paul Charette, FILED. Service date 09/06/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 09/06/2024 04:47 PM] |
| Filing 8 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant James McMahon, Appellant Paul Charette, FILED. Service date 09/06/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 09/06/2024 04:44 PM] |
| Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant James McMahon, Appellant Paul Charette, FILED. Service date 09/06/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 09/06/2024 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION, to dismiss, on behalf of Appellee Edward Greene, FILED. Service date 09/04/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 09/04/2024 08:41 AM] |
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Edward Greene, FILED. Service date 09/04/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 09/04/2024 08:38 AM] |
| Filing 4 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant James McMahon, Paul Charette, recevied on 08/23/2024, OPENED. [Entered: 08/28/2024 04:21 PM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant James McMahon, Paul Charette, district court receipt #ACTDC-7880334, FILED. [Entered: 08/28/2024 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT RULING, dated 07/25/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 08/28/2024 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant James McMahon, Paul Charette, FILED. [Entered: 08/28/2024 04:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
