Javino v. Denton
| DALE ROBERT JAVINO |
| TIMOTHY B. GLYNN, JULIE PRATT, GLYNN, MERCEP & PURCELL, LLP, GEORGE REHN, CPA, RANEE DENTON, ALAN B. ROSEN, CRAIG PURCELL, BRIDGEHAMPTON NATIONAL BANK, And others whom will be gleaned through discovery and BI-TECH ENTERPRISES, INC. |
| 24-2676 |
| October 9, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, George Lewis, Ryan Matthew Soebke, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 10/09/2024 11:37 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE, to George Rehn, CPA, regarding a corporation proceeding Pro Se, and requesting a response 30 days from the date of this letter, copy to pro se appeallant, SENT. [Entered: 10/09/2024 11:33 AM] [Edited: 10/09/2024 11:38 AM] |
| Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 10/09/2024 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 4 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Dale Robert Javino, received on 10/07/2024, OPENED. [Entered: 10/09/2024 11:19 AM] |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 10/09/2024 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 3 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Dale Robert Javino, district court receipt #200004242, FILED. [Entered: 10/09/2024 11:14 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, dated 09/13/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 10/09/2024 11:12 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Dale Robert Javino, FILED. [Entered: 10/09/2024 11:10 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.