Fields v. Pfizer
MARCUS BRENT FIELDS |
KATALIN KARIKO, Bio-N-Tech, Bio-Chemist, PFIZER INC., ALBERT BOURLA, CEO, DREW WEISSMAN, Covid-19 MRNA Inventor and JOHN AND JANE DOES, Scientist-Chemist-Physicist |
24-2735 |
October 17, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, motion, demand for jury trial, at docket entry 9, on behalf of Appellant Marcus Brent Fields, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 10/17/2024 01:53 PM] |
Filing 8 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED. [Entered: 10/17/2024 01:22 PM] |
Filing 7 NOTICE, to Pfizer Inc., regarding a corporation proceeding Pro Se, and requesting a response 30 days from the date of this letter, SENT. [Entered: 10/17/2024 01:16 PM] |
Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se Appellee Albert Bourla SENT. [Entered: 10/17/2024 01:06 PM] |
Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se Appellant Marcus Brent Fields, SENT. [Entered: 10/17/2024 12:53 PM] |
Filing 4 PRISONER APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Marcus Brent Fields, received by 10/11/2024, OPENED. [Entered: 10/17/2024 12:43 PM] |
Filing 9 MOTION, demand for jury trial, on behalf of Appellant Marcus Brent Fields, FILED. [Entered: 10/17/2024 01:40 PM] |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 10/17/2024 12:36 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 09/11/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 10/17/2024 12:29 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Marcus Brent Fields, FILED. [Entered: 10/17/2024 12:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.