Mendoza v. Edge
| RUDY MENDOZA |
| Warden H. TELLEZ, Metropolitan Detention Center, JOHN DOE #3, Warden D. EDGE, Lieutenant REGINALD BARR, S.I.S. TECHNICIAN FIELDS, Special Investigative Services, Metropolitan Detention Center, Captain J. WHITE, JANE DOE #4, JOHN DOE #2, S.I.S L. PORTNOY, Technician, Special Investigative Services and JOHN DOE #1 |
| 24-2859 |
| October 30, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of D. Edge, H. Tellez, J. White, L. Portnoy, Reginald Barr, Technician Fields, FILED. [Entered: 10/31/2024 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of D. Edge, H. Tellez, J. White, L. Portnoy, Reginald Barr, Technician Fields, FILED. [Entered: 10/30/2024 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 7 AUTHORIZATION FORM, REQUESTED. [Entered: 10/30/2024 10:05 AM] |
| Filing 6 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 10/30/2024 10:00 AM] |
| Filing 5 PRISONER APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Rudy Mendoza, received on 10/25/2024, OPENED. [Entered: 10/30/2024 09:57 AM] |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 10/30/2024 09:51 AM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 09/25/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 10/30/2024 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 09/25/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 10/30/2024 09:46 AM] [Edited: 10/30/2024 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Rudy Mendoza, FILED. [Entered: 10/30/2024 09:43 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
