Hessler v. United States of America
| SIMON HESSLER |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 24-2986 |
| November 14, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 STRIKE ORDER, striking Appellant Simon Hessler Letter at entry number 13 from the docket, FILED. [Entered: 01/06/2025 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 16 MOTION, for certificate of appealability, on behalf of Appellant Simon Hessler, FILED. Service date 01/02/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 01/02/2025 08:37 AM] |
Filing 15
ORDER, dated 12/19/2024, dismissing appeal by 01/02/2025, unless Appellant Simon Hessler , moves for certificate of appealability, FILED. [Entered: 12/19/2024 05:32 PM]
|
| Filing 14 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Letter, at docket entry 13, on behalf of Appellant Simon Hessler, copy to pro se appellant, FILED. [Entered: 12/19/2024 04:13 PM] |
| Filing 13 LETTER, dated 12/12/2024, in regards to filing Brief and Appendix on or before February 24, 2025, on behalf of Appellant Simon Hessler, RECEIVED. Service date 12/12/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 12/12/2024 08:56 AM] [Edited: 12/19/2024 03:56 PM] |
| Filing 12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Simon Hessler, FILED. Service date 12/12/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 12/12/2024 08:48 AM] |
| Filing 11 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Simon Hessler, FILED. Service date 12/12/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 12/12/2024 08:42 AM] |
| Filing 10 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Simon Hessler, FILED. Service date 12/12/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 12/12/2024 08:40 AM] |
| Filing 9 ATTORNEY, Daniel George, for Appellee United States of America, ADDED. [Entered: 11/25/2024 12:55 PM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of United States of America, FILED. [Entered: 11/18/2024 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 7 PRISONER APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Simon Hessler, received on 11/12/2024, OPENED. [Entered: 11/14/2024 11:08 AM] |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 11/14/2024 10:57 AM] |
| Filing 5 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Simon Hessler, district court receipt #BCTDC-7964755, FILED. [Entered: 11/14/2024 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 4 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 11/01/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 11/14/2024 10:50 AM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 11/01/2024, denying certificate of appealability, RECEIVED. [Entered: 11/14/2024 10:48 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 11/01/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 11/14/2024 10:43 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Simon Hessler, FILED. [Entered: 11/14/2024 10:36 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Hessler v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Sandra Slack Glover |
| Represented By: | Daniel George |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: SIMON HESSLER | |
| Represented By: | Michael H. Sussman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.