Does v. New York City
JANE DOES and JOHN DOES |
BENJAMIN FEY, Doctor of Maimonides Medical Center, ERIN, Manager of Maimonides Medical Center, 6th Floor Mental Ill Department, Police Officer EMANUEL ROBERT, individually and official capacity, ERIC ADAMS, individually and official capacity, Judge CAROLINE COHEN, individually and personal capacity, Police Officer Sergeant JOHN SICILIANO, individually and official capacity, Lt. MIGUEL IGLESIAS, Chief of Internal Affairs, individually and personal capacity, GABRIEL TUDOSE, Doctor of Maimonides Medical Center, ERIC GONZALEZ, Kings County Attorney, individually and personal capacity, SHIMSON E. MORDECHAY, MATTHEW A. DUSENBERRY, Attorney, ACE MANAGEMENT LLC, MAGDALENA FILARDO, Maimonides Medical Center, EDON SEDJUI, CELINA CHRISTY, Nurse of Maimonides Medical Center, EDWARD A. CABAN, NYPD Commissioner, individually, GOERGE MORDECHAY, Police Office ROBERTS GONZALES, individually and official capacity, TANUSH SEDJUI, Super of Lilmor Management LLC, RACHEL MORDECHAY, Lieutenant Police Officer DANIEL LOFFREDO, KENNETH GIBBS, CEO of Maimonides Medical Center, individually and personal capacity, JULIE RAMALEY CUEVA, MICHEAL LAMBERT, Esq., KENNETH RUSSO, Esq., Officer LEE, Badge 6159 of Criminal Court, individually and official capacity, BROOK, Supervisor of Police Officers of Kings County Criminal Court, individually and personal capacity and OMAR GUSEYNOV, Police Officer 123 Precinct |
24-3064 |
November 22, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE, to Ace Management LLC, regarding a corporation proceeding Pro Se, and requesting a response 30 days from the date of this letter, SENT. [Entered: 11/22/2024 02:59 PM] |
Filing 12 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se Appellee Tanush Sedjui, Edon Sedjui, Goerge Mordechay, Shimson E. Mordechay, Rachel Mordechay, SENT. [Entered: 11/22/2024 02:55 PM] |
Filing 11 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se Appellants John Does and Jane Does, SENT. [Entered: 11/22/2024 02:53 PM] |
Filing 10 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Kenneth Bruce Russo for Appellee Kenneth Russo, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 11/22/2024 02:50 PM] |
Filing 9 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Michael Leigh Lambert for Appellee Micheal Lambert, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 11/22/2024 02:48 PM] |
Filing 8 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Matthew Adam-Philip Dusenberry for Appelle Matthew A. Dusenberry, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 11/22/2024 02:43 PM] |
Filing 7 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Jane Does, John Does, received on 11/08/2024, OPENED. [Entered: 11/22/2024 02:40 PM] |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 11/22/2024 02:37 PM] |
Filing 5 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Jane Does, John Does, district court receipt #100017709, FILED. [Entered: 11/22/2024 02:33 PM] |
Filing 4 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, entered in the district court as docket entry dated 11/04/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 11/22/2024 02:30 PM] |
Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 10/10/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 11/22/2024 02:28 PM] |
Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, entered in the district court as docket entry dated 10/11/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 11/22/2024 02:26 PM] |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Jane Does, John Does, FILED. [Entered: 11/22/2024 02:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.