Syntel, Inc. v. The Trizetto Group, Inc.
| SYNTEL, INC. and SYNTEL STERLING BEST SHORES MAURITIUS LTD. |
| THE TRIZETTO GROUP, INC. and COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORP. |
| 24-3088 |
| November 27, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 36 OPPOSITION, to Motion FILED, 34, on behalf of Respondent The Trizetto Group, Inc., Respondent Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., FILED. Service date 12/27/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 12/27/2024 06:09 PM] |
| Filing 35 MOTION ORDER, referring motion for leave to file, at docket entry 34, on behalf of Petitioner Syntel, Inc., Petitioner Syntel Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Ltd.,to the three-judge panel that will decide the petition, FILED. [Entered: 12/20/2024 09:39 AM] |
| Filing 34 MOTION, for leave to file, on behalf of Petitioner Syntel, Inc., Petitioner Syntel Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Ltd., FILED. Service date 12/19/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 12/19/2024 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 33 ATTORNEY, Adam R. Alper, Leslie Schmidt, Michael De Vries for Respondent The Trizetto Group, Inc., Respondent Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., Respondent The Trizetto Group, Inc., Respondent Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., Respondent The Trizetto Group, Inc., Respondent Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., ADDED. [Entered: 12/13/2024 04:20 PM] |
| Filing 32 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, opposition, to Petition for leave to appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292b, at entry 31, on behalf of Respondent The Trizetto Group, Inc., Respondent Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., FILED. [Entered: 12/13/2024 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 31 OPPOSITION, to Petition for leave to appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292b, FILED. Service date 12/13/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 12/13/2024 03:35 PM] [Edited: 12/13/2024 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 30 SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX, on behalf of Respondent The Trizetto Group, Inc., Respondent Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., FILED. [Entered: 12/13/2024 10:14 AM] |
| Filing 29 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Opposition, at docket entry 28, on behalf of Respondent The Trizetto Group, Inc., Respondent Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., FILED. [Entered: 12/13/2024 09:27 AM] |
| Filing 28 OPPOSITION, to Petition for leave to appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292b FILED, 1, on behalf of Respondent The Trizetto Group, Inc., Respondent Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., FILED. Service date 12/12/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 12/12/2024 08:14 PM] |
| Filing 27 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., The Trizetto Group, Inc., FILED. [Entered: 12/11/2024 07:07 PM] |
| Filing 26 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., The Trizetto Group, Inc., FILED. [Entered: 12/11/2024 07:02 PM] |
| Filing 25 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., The Trizetto Group, Inc., FILED. [Entered: 12/11/2024 06:54 PM] |
| Filing 24 ATTORNEY, Anna Jayne Goodman, James Durling, Benjamin Miller-Gootnick, Jaren Janghorbani, Crystal Lohmann Parker, for Petitioner Syntel, Inc., Petitioner Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Ltd., ADDED. [Entered: 12/05/2024 04:43 PM] |
| Filing 23 MOTION ORDER, granting motion for extension of time, at docket entry 16, on behalf of Respondent The Trizetto Group, Inc., Respondent Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., the opposition to the petition for leave to appeal must be filed by 12/12/2024, by ECL, FILED. [Entered: 12/05/2024 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 22 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Ltd., Syntel, Inc., FILED. [Entered: 12/04/2024 11:33 AM] |
| Filing 21 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Ltd., Syntel, Inc., FILED. [Entered: 12/04/2024 11:22 AM] |
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Ltd., Syntel, Inc., FILED. [Entered: 12/04/2024 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Ltd., Syntel, Inc., FILED. [Entered: 12/04/2024 11:10 AM] |
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Ltd., Syntel, Inc., FILED. [Entered: 12/04/2024 11:07 AM] |
| Filing 17 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Petitioner Syntel, Inc., Petitioner Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Ltd., FILED. Service date 12/04/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 12/04/2024 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 16 MOTION, for extension of time, on behalf of Respondent The Trizetto Group, Inc., Respondent Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., FILED. Service date 12/02/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 12/02/2024 01:59 PM] |
| Filing 15 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Respondent The Trizetto Group, Inc., Respondent Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., FILED. Service date 12/02/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 12/02/2024 01:54 PM] |
| Filing 14 ATTORNEY, Gianni L. Cutri for Appellees The TriZetto Group, Inc., Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., TERMINATED. [Entered: 12/02/2024 01:23 PM] |
| Filing 13 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, notice of appearance, at entry 11, on behalf of Respondent The Trizetto Group, Inc., Respondent Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., FILED. [Entered: 12/02/2024 01:21 PM] |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY, John C. O'Quinn in place of attorney Gianni Cutri, SUBSTITUTED. [Entered: 12/02/2024 01:20 PM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., The Trizetto Group, Inc., FILED. [Entered: 12/02/2024 01:03 PM] |
| Filing 10 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, notice of appearance, at docket entry 5, on behalf of Respondent The Trizetto Group, Inc., Respondent Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., FILED. [Entered: 12/02/2024 12:38 PM] |
| Filing 9 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, notice of appearance, at docket entry 4, on behalf of Respondent The Trizetto Group, Inc., Respondent Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., FILED. [Entered: 12/02/2024 12:34 PM] |
| Filing 8 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, notice of appearance, at docket entry 3, on behalf of Respondent The Trizetto Group, Inc., Respondent Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., FILED. [Entered: 12/02/2024 12:29 PM] |
| Filing 7 ATTORNEY, Jason M. Wilcox, for Respondent The Trizetto Group, Inc., Respondent Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., ADDED. [Entered: 12/02/2024 12:12 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., The Trizetto Group, Inc., FILED. [Entered: 11/27/2024 04:59 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., The Trizetto Group, Inc., FILED. [Entered: 11/27/2024 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., The Trizetto Group, Inc., FILED. [Entered: 11/27/2024 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL/ADDITIONAL COUNSEL, on behalf of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., The Trizetto Group, Inc., FILED. [Entered: 11/27/2024 04:23 PM] |
| Filing 2 Petititon for leave to appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292(b), on behalf of Petitioner Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Ltd., Petitioner Syntel, Inc., received on 11/26/2024, OPENED. [Entered: 11/27/2024 12:48 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION, for leave to appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292b, on behalf of Petitioner Sterling Best Shores Mauritius Ltd., Petitioner Syntel, Inc., FILED. [Entered: 11/27/2024 11:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
