Matusak v. Daminski
| CHRISTOPHER MATUSAK |
| Deputy MATTHEW DAMINSKI, Sgt. BRIAN UNTERBORN, Individually and as Employees of the Monroe County Sheriffs Office and Deputy STEPHEN MURPHY |
| 24-3157 |
| December 6, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 SO-ORDERED SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, setting Appellant Christopher Matusak Virk Brief due date as 03/31/2025. Joint Appendix due date as 03/31/2025, FILED. [Entered: 01/17/2025 02:05 PM] |
| Filing 21 NEW CASE MANAGER, Oscar Rivas, ASSIGNED. [Entered: 01/17/2025 09:12 AM] |
| Filing 20 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment Notice of Appearance Form, at entry 19, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Matusak, FILED. [Entered: 01/10/2025 11:51 AM] |
| Filing 19 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Matusak, FILED. Service date 01/07/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 01/07/2025 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 18 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellee Matthew Daminski, Appellee Stephen Murphy, Appellee Brian Unterborn, FILED. Service date 01/06/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 01/06/2025 10:12 AM] |
| Filing 17 NOTICE, to Appellees, for failure to file an appearance, SENT. [Entered: 01/06/2025 09:51 AM] |
| Filing 16 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Acknowledgment Notice of Appearance Form, at docket entry 15, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Matusak, FILED. [Entered: 01/06/2025 09:33 AM] |
| Filing 15 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Matusak, FILED. Service date 01/02/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 01/02/2025 08:06 AM] |
| Filing 14 LR 31.2 SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Matusak, informing Court of proposed due date 03/31/2025, RECEIVED. Service date 01/02/2025 by ACMS. [Entered: 01/02/2025 07:48 AM] |
| Filing 13 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 12/19/2024 09:32 AM] |
| Filing 12 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form C FILED, at entry 9, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Matusak, FILED. [Entered: 12/17/2024 01:25 PM] |
| Filing 11 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form C FILED, at docket entry 7, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Matusak, FILED. [Entered: 12/17/2024 01:23 PM] |
| Filing 10 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Form C FILED, at docket entry 6, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Matusak, FILED. [Entered: 12/17/2024 01:22 PM] |
| Filing 9 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Matusak, FILED. Service date 12/16/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 12/16/2024 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 8 FORM D, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Matusak, FILED. Service date 12/16/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 12/16/2024 02:54 PM] |
| Filing 7 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Matusak, FILED. Service date 12/16/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 12/16/2024 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 6 FORM C, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Matusak, FILED. Service date 12/16/2024 by ACMS. [Entered: 12/16/2024 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 5 PRISONER APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Matusak, received on 12/03/24, OPENED. [Entered: 12/06/2024 11:35 AM] |
| Filing 4 PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Matusak, district court receipt # ANYWDC-5344156, FILED. [Entered: 12/06/2024 11:25 AM] |
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 11/04/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 12/06/2024 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT DECISION AND ORDER, dated 11/01/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 12/06/2024 11:17 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF PRISONER APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Christopher Matusak, FILED. [Entered: 12/06/2024 11:10 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
