Pittman v. Breier
| DEBORAH PITTMAN |
| JAMES PETTUS |
| Board of Directors 800 GRAND CONCOURSE OWNERS, INC., GEIST SCHWARZ & JELLINEK, PLLC, Judge MCSHAN, MATTHEW D. SCHWARZ, Judge BRIGANTI, Judge HAGLER, Judge LACH and Judge MIRIAM BREIER |
| 24-3243 |
| December 13, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 AMENDED MANDATE, dated 01/24/2025 to SDNY (NEW YORK CITY), copy sent to pro se appellant, ISSUED. [24-3249, 24-3238, 24-3243, 24-3253] [Entered: 01/24/2025 02:28 PM] |
| Filing 19 AMENDED ORDER, dated 01/24/2025, withdrawing the appeals, on bahalf of Appellant Deborah Pittman and Petitioner James Pettus, copy sen tto pro se appellant, FILED. [24-3249, 24-3238, 24-3243, 24-3253] [Entered: 01/24/2025 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 18 CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER, dated 01/23/2025, determining the appeal to SDNY (NEW YORK CITY), copy sent to pro se appellant, ISSUED.[Mandate] [24-3238, 24-3243, 24-3249, 24-3253] [Entered: 01/23/2025 04:20 PM] |
| Filing 17 MOTION ORDER,granting motion to withdraw appeals, on behalf of Appellant Deborah Pittman, copy sent to pro se appellant, FILED. [24-3238, 24-3243, 24-3249, 24-3253] [Entered: 01/23/2025 04:15 PM] [Edited: 01/23/2025 04:53 PM] |
| Filing 16 NEW CASE MANAGER, Ralph Obas, ASSIGNED. [24-3238, 24-3243, 24-3249, 24-3253] [Entered: 01/23/2025 04:10 PM] |
| Filing 15 CURED DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, Motion, to withdraw appeal, at entry 14, on behalf of Petitioner James Pettus, FILED. [Entered: 01/22/2025 06:34 PM] |
| Filing 14 MOTION, to withdraw appeal, on behalf of Petitioner James Pettus, FILED. Service date 01/20/2025 by United States Mail. [Entered: 01/22/2025 06:32 PM] |
| Filing 13 PAPERS, Duplicate Motion to withdraw appeal, RECEIVED. [Entered: 01/07/2025 02:12 AM] |
| Filing 12 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, motion to withdraw appeal, at docket entry 11, on behalf of Petitioner James Pettus, copy to pro se petitioner, FILED. [Entered: 01/02/2025 11:45 AM] |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY, Barbara D. Underwood for Respondents, TERMINATED. [Entered: 12/31/2024 02:38 PM] |
| Filing 9 LETTER, dated 12/31/2024, requesting to terminate counsel, on behalf of Respondent Miriam Breier, Respondent Lach, Respondent Briganti, Respondent Hagler, Respondent McShan, RECEIVED. Service date 12/31/2024 by United States Mail. [Entered: 12/31/2024 01:52 PM] |
| Filing 11 MOTION, to withdraw appeal, on behalf of Petitioner James Pettus, FILED. Service date 12/30/2024 by United States Mail. [Entered: 01/02/2025 12:55 AM] |
| Filing 8 PAPERS, Documents relevant to case, RECEIVED. [Entered: 12/26/2024 09:25 PM] [Edited: 01/30/2025 10:57 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE, to 800 Grand Concourse Owners, Inc., Geist Schwarz & Jellinek, PLLC, regarding a corporation proceeding Pro Se, and requesting a response 30 days from the date of this letter, SENT. [Entered: 12/13/2024 01:10 PM] |
| Filing 5 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Matthew D. Schwarz, orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 12/13/2024 01:05 PM] |
Filing 4
ORDER, dated 12/13/2024, dimissing appeal by 01/03/2025, unless Petitioner James Pettus, submits a motion for leave to file, copy to pro se, FILED. [Entered: 12/13/2024 01:03 PM]
|
| Filing 3 DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT, dated 10/30/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 12/13/2024 12:51 PM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER OF DISMISSAL, dated 10/28/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 12/13/2024 12:49 PM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Petitioner James Pettus, RECEIVED. [Entered: 12/13/2024 12:44 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
