Warren v. Ebay, Inc.
| GREGORY WARREN |
| OLDBOOMBOX, Seller on Ebay, EBAY, INC., JAMIE LANNONE, Pres./CEO of Ebay, CYRIL B., customer support representative at Ebay, KADESH, customer support representative at Ebay, GENEVIEVE LEAH, customer support representative Manager at Ebay, SHEILA V., customer support representative at Ebay and Jurga Jurgute |
| 24-386 |
| February 15, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NON-ADMITTED ATTORNEY, Appellee Ebay, Inc., orally informed to apply for admission forthwith and submit Addendum A to Notice of Appearance, NOTIFIED. [Entered: 02/15/2024 12:30 PM] |
| Filing 7 DEFECTIVE DOCUMENT, motion to proceed in forma pauperis, at docket entry 6, on behalf of Appellant Gregory Warren, FILED. [Entered: 02/15/2024 12:27 PM] |
| Filing 5 INSTRUCTIONAL FORMS, to Pro Se litigant, SENT. [Entered: 02/15/2024 12:05 PM] |
| Filing 4 CIVIL APPEAL, on behalf of Appellant Gregory Warren, received on 02/09/2024, OPENED. [Entered: 02/15/2024 12:03 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION, to proceed in forma pauperis, on behalf of Appellant Gregory Warren, FILED. Service date 02/09/2024 by No Service. [Entered: 02/15/2024 12:22 PM] |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC INDEX, in lieu of record, FILED. [Entered: 02/15/2024 11:56 AM] |
| Filing 2 DISTRICT COURT ORDER, dated 01/08/2024, RECEIVED. [Entered: 02/15/2024 11:48 AM] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF CIVIL APPEAL, with district court docket, on behalf of Appellant Gregory Warren, FILED. [Entered: 02/15/2024 11:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
